First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 170711
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug 167201
Assigned To: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Stefan Behte <craig@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 170711 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 170711 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-03-13 10:00 0000 
As seen in GLSA 200703-03
(http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200703-03.xml)

CVE-2007-0897
CVE-2007-0898

Shouldn't we mask/patch 0.90?

------- Comment #1 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2007-03-13 10:15:43 0000 ------- 
I fail to see what needs to be fixed, as mentioned in the GLSA 0.90 is _not_
vulnerable. If there is something that I've overlooked feel free to reopen.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 167201 ***

------- Comment #2 From Stefan Behte 2007-03-13 19:15:46 0000 ------- 
Damn. I should sleep more; I read <= vulnerable. Sorry! :(
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug