Bugzilla Bug 165213

Dates is a small, lightweight calendar that uses libebook
(evolution-data-server).

Ebuild is attached. Package works fine for me, but dependencies and the icon
cache update part should be checked.

Created an attachment (id=109063) [details]
Ebuild for gnome-extra/dates-0.3.1

Created an attachment (id=116205) [details]
New ebuild for dates-0.3.1

Added pkgconfig as dependency and change website-url and download-url since the
project is now a part of Pimlico Project.

Created an attachment (id=116206) [details]
Ebuild for gnome-extra/dates-0.4.1

Added ebuild for dates-0.4.1 which is the newest version.
Added pkgconfig as dependency and fixed urls.

The ebuild works well under PPC too. Can you please add ~ppc to it?

Created an attachment (id=116365) [details]
Ebuild for gnome-extra/dates-0.4.1 - with ppc

New ebuild added with support for ppc. Deprecates older ebuild for dates-0.4.1

(In reply to comment #4)
> The ebuild works well under PPC too. Can you please add ~ppc to it?
> 

Added for dates-0.4.1. Does it also work on ppc for dates-0.3.1?

Yes, it does. Thank you.

Created an attachment (id=122328) [details]
Ebuild for gnome-extra/dates-0.4.3

Ebuild for newest version of Dates.

Created an attachment (id=125167) [details]
Ebuild for gnome-extra/dates-0.4.4

Created an attachment (id=128788) [details]
Revised ebuild for gnome-extra/dates-0.4.4

I have cleaned up the ebuild, added some missing dependencies. The ebuild now
inherits gnome2 and I have added ~amd64.

Created an attachment (id=138387) [details]
Ebuild for dates-0.4.5

Added some missing dependencies (though they are already present if the system
is sane).

Created an attachment (id=166892) [details]
dates-0.4.6

Bumped to 0.4.6. Dropped indirect deps. Added gconf dep.
I think app-office would be better category for this package.

(this is an automated message based on filtering criteria that matched this
bug)
'EBUILD' is in the KEYWORDS which should mean that there is a ebuild attached 
to this bug.
This bug is assigned to maintainer-wanted which means that it is not in the 
main tree.
Heuristics show that no Gentoo developer has commented on your ebuild.

Hello, The Gentoo Team would like to firstly thank you for your ebuild 
submission. We also apologize for not being able to accommodate you in a timely
manner. There are simply too many new packages.

Allow me to use this opportunity to introduce you to Gentoo Sunrise. The 
sunrise overlay[1] is a overlay for Gentoo which we allow trusted users to 
commit to and all users can have ebuilds reviewed by Gentoo devs for entry 
into the overlay. So, the sunrise team is suggesting that you look into this 
and submit your ebuild to the overlay where even *you* can commit to. =)

Because this is a mass message, we are also asking you to be patient with us. 
We anticipate a large number of requests in a short time. 

Thanks,
On behalf of the Gentoo Sunrise Team,
Jeremy.

[1]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/sunrise/
[2]: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/SunriseFaq

Created an attachment (id=204371) [details]
dates-0.4.10.ebuild

updated ebuild