First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 160669
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Java team <java@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 160669 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 160669 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2007-01-07 13:00 0000 
dev-java/jdom is currently slotted on ${PV} which is not good and it even
doesn't seem to be correct. I just compared jdom-1.0_beta9-r1 and jdom-1.0 and
according to apicheck they are 100% compatible so there is no need to have two
slots: 1.0_beta9 and jdom-1.0.

Few packages are depending on jdom so it would be good to move those that
depend on slot 1.0_beta9 to slot jdom-1.0 and get rid of the beta9 and beta10
jdom as 1.0 is already stable.

------- Comment #1 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2007-01-07 13:34:42 0000 ------- 
I agree, I don't see why this slot madness.
Note that 1.0 isn't stable ppc64, not even ~ppc64 although at least jaxen
(depending on jdom) already is... so we need to get this fixed first.

------- Comment #2 From Petteri Räty 2007-01-07 13:53:42 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #1)
> I agree, I don't see why this slot madness.
> Note that 1.0 isn't stable ppc64, not even ~ppc64 although at least jaxen
> (depending on jdom) already is... so we need to get this fixed first. 
> 

We could use this opportunity to get gen 2 version 1.0-r2 stable. I just added
r2:
*jdom-1.0-r2 (07 Jan 2007)

  07 Jan 2007; Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> +jdom-1.0-r2.ebuild:
  Changed javadocs to install to standard location and add missing
  app-arch/zip DEPEND for the source use flag.

If you are not confortable with this, go with 1.0-r1, but then we should add
the missing dep there. It will likely take a while before ppc64 gets 1.0*
stable as it is not even ~arch there now.

------- Comment #3 From Christian Faulhammer 2007-01-09 10:38:03 0000 ------- 
x86 jdominates!

------- Comment #4 From Markus Rothe 2007-01-11 13:59:51 0000 ------- 
jdom-1.0-r2 stable on ppc64.

I doubt that anybody would have tested this any further in a four weeks period
it's ~ppc64.

Note that I've stabilized commons-beanutils-1.6.1-r3,
commons-beanutils-1.7.0-r2 and commons-lang-2.0-r2, too, because previous
stable versions didn't compile and the only change according to the changelog
was gen-2 compatibility.

------- Comment #5 From Steve Dibb 2007-01-15 12:36:37 0000 ------- 
amd64 stable

------- Comment #6 From N. Dan Smith 2007-01-30 02:14:07 0000 ------- 
ppc stable

------- Comment #7 From Joe Jezak 2007-01-30 02:27:00 0000 ------- 
Closing since we're the last arch.  Thanks to ndansmith for testing.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug