First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 138889
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) <seemant@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: James Rowe <jnrowe@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
ipkg-utils-version_bump.patch ipkg-utils-version_bump.patch patch James Rowe 2006-07-02 10:55 0000 1.16 KB Details | Diff
ipkg-utils-suggest_fakeroot.patch ipkg-utils-suggest_fakeroot.patch patch James Rowe 2006-07-02 10:57 0000 546 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 138889 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 138889 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-07-02 10:54 0000 
ipkg-utils is lagging behind current releases, attached is a patch to
bring it up to date.

Thanks 


James

------- Comment #1 From James Rowe 2006-07-02 10:55:37 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=90708) [details]
ipkg-utils-version_bump.patch

------- Comment #2 From James Rowe 2006-07-02 10:56:04 0000 ------- 
Seemant,

  Well, I still believe the new version string is correct and as I stated in
the mail I can't see another way to guarantee versioning correctly should
a return to numbered releases happen.  If I'm wrong, or there is a better
way send it and swift kick this way please.

Cheers

------- Comment #3 From James Rowe 2006-07-02 10:57:11 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=90709) [details]
ipkg-utils-suggest_fakeroot.patch

  I'd also like you to commit the second patch, which contains a small
pkg_postinst() info chunk telling people to install and use fakeroot.
I feel it is very important, but not important enough to require an explicit
dep.  I understand fully if you feel it shouldn't be in the ebuild, which is
why it is a separate patch.

------- Comment #4 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2006-07-12 05:05:58 0000 ------- 
sorry for the delay there, James. In portage now.  Have a good holiday :)
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug