First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 135417
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Radoslaw Stachowiak <radek@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Josu López Fernández <zamorate@gentoo-es.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
p7zip-4.42.ebuild.patch p7zip-4.42.ebuild.patch patch Josu López Fernández 2006-06-03 11:24 0000 515 bytes Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 135417 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 135417 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-06-03 11:24 0000 
Hello!
The versions 4.39 and 4.42 of p7zip fail on cross compilation. This is because
in the ebuild, we can see this:
# be aware that CXX is now gcc in pattern due to upstream  (radek@20060318)
But now, with this two versions, this isn't true, in the makefile CXX is
defined with g++. So the sed doesn't work, it changes CC but not CXX. To fix it
is only needed to change this into the ebuild, like in the path which I supply.
It is for the 4.42 version, but is the same fix for both versions. I have
tested between amd64, x86 and ppc and works well

Good Bye!

------- Comment #1 From Josu López Fernández 2006-06-03 11:24:52 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=88281) [details]
p7zip-4.42.ebuild.patch

------- Comment #2 From Radoslaw Stachowiak 2006-06-03 14:06:57 0000 ------- 
FIxed in 4.42 - Coyld You please confirm that it works for You fine now?

------- Comment #3 From Josu López Fernández 2006-06-03 16:41:24 0000 ------- 
Yes, I have recompiled and works well.

Good Bye!

------- Comment #4 From Michael Weyershäuser 2006-07-11 09:56:27 0000 ------- 
Guess somebody forgot to resolve this ^^
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug