Bugzilla Bug 129809

Dear amd64 team,

According to user reports and one of the main developers of  
sci-libs/itpp, the package should compile and work fine on amd64.
I was therefore wondering if you could please mark sci-libs/itpp-3.10.1
~amd64.

Thank you very much,
Markus

Could you please give us some test data (inputs and outputs) and the proper
commandline syntax to test this.

(In reply to comment #1)
> Could you please give us some test data (inputs and outputs) and the proper
> commandline syntax to test this.

Hi! 

You can test both cblas-reference and itpp libraries by executing a set of
tests prepared in IT++. Just emerge blas-reference, lapack-reference,
cblas-reference and fftw and then:
% USE="blas cblas lapack fftw" ebuild itpp-3.10.1.ebuild test
All test should finish with status "PASSED". This means that IT++ can be
properly linked and used with blas, cblas, lapack and fftw libraries from
Gentoo.
If you have more time, you can try to test IT++ linked against blas-atlas and
lapack-atlas libraries. BTW, blas-atlas includes C interface to blas (cblas).

Hope this helps.

/ediap

Hi!

IT++ 3.10.2, which is in portage tree for some time, should work fine on amd64
as well, since it is only a minor release (only bug-fixes have been commited,
no new functionality added).

BR,
/ediap

Dear amd64 folks,

I've just bumped itpp to version 3.10.3. Would you please
be so kind to mark it ~amd64 should it compile and work
properly. itpp comes with a set of test routines that
can be executed via

# USE="blas cblas lapack fftw" ebuild itpp-3.10.3.ebuild test

Thank you very much in advance!

best,
Markus

Dear amd64 team,

Has anyone of you spoted this request for keywording? itpp-3.10.3 was yesterday
marked stable on x86, so it's the highest time for your move ;-)

Thanks!

/ediap
(one of the IT++ library maintainers and developers)

The sci team has now keyworded itpp-3.10.5 as ~amd64.

Thanks,
Markus