Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 12785 - Combine gentoo-stats and gentoo-stable to simplify package status entry
Summary: Combine gentoo-stats and gentoo-stable to simplify package status entry
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 30923
Alias: None
Product: Websites
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Arun Bhanu (RETIRED)
URL: http://gentoo-stable.iq-computing.de/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-12-27 08:07 UTC by Alec Berryman
Modified: 2005-07-17 13:06 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alec Berryman 2002-12-27 08:07:49 UTC
Gentoo-stats and gentoo-stable overlap in package reporting.  If a package is
reported present on gentoo-stats, then it could be reported as merged on
gentoo-stable except in the case of injected packages.

The current menu structure of gentoo-stable is massive.  The process of manually
entering results from the provided unstable script to gentoo-stable is very time
consuming and tedious even though the interface is simple and straightforward.

The addition to gentoo-stable would be a menu for users who chose to associate
their gentoo-stats ID with their gentoo-stable login ID.  This menu would have
four columns: package name, package version, a checkbox for succesful merge, and
a checkbox for working.  Gentoo-stats and gentoo-stable would remain otherwise
unchanged.

Correlating gentoo-stats system IDs to gentoo-stable login IDs would benefit the
user and the developer.  With this new system, the user could easily confim that
the packages reported merged on his system were actually merged (not injected),
and that the user has tested to see they work reliably.  Because reporting
merged and working packages is simpler and less time consuming, the developers
should expect more response from the users.
Comment 1 Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-06 05:16:52 UTC
Alec, would you be interested in working on doing this (officially, as a gentoo developer)?

Please e-me, if so.
Comment 2 Zach Welch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-07 23:35:20 UTC
Please consider helping tie this into something larger than itself.  See
my Udder project proposal at http://cvs.gentoo.org/~zwelch/groupware.html
for another idea of how this functionality might be leveraged.
Comment 3 Daniel Armyr 2003-04-22 11:47:51 UTC
On the topic of feature requests for stable, it would be nice if a package could be marked on a scale. I often find that a new component works pretty much as it should, but every now and then it shows some signs of missbehaving. Usually it is completely unreproductible and therefore submitting a bug is quite useless. This sort of behavior is most common in big and complex packages like xfree. Considdering I know how rock-stable *x programs can be I feel hesitant to mark a program as completely stable if it is only as stable as your regular Windows system. 

My 2 cens.
//Daniel Armyr
Singapore
Comment 4 Graham Forest 2003-04-24 04:01:32 UTC
Grab me on irc or mail me if you want some extra hands working on the Perl aspect (client side) of this.
Comment 5 Heinrich Wendel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-11 13:11:36 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30923 ***