First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 125212
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: CLOSED
Resolution: TEST-REQUEST
Assigned To: Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) <kevquinn@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Andreas Proschofsky <suka@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 125212 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 125212 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.




View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-03-06 03:09 0000 
As OpenOffice.org 2.0.2 is coming up (actually tomorrow) and we are now
depending on hunspell, it would be great to have the latest version of it in
portage, which is 1.1.4. Kevin: Do you want to do the revision bump, or should
I take care of this?

------- Comment #1 From Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-03-06 09:34:36 0000 ------- 
Done :)  Please check for yourself, and mark FIXED if it's ok.
BTW if it happens again, I'm happy for you to bump it - no need to hold up
openoffice on my acocunt...

I guess we should ask sparc and ppc (the other arches that build openoffice) to
check it builds for them and mark ~sparc/~ppc - should we do that on this bug
or open new ones?

------- Comment #2 From Andreas Proschofsky 2006-03-06 14:58:08 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #1)
> 
> I guess we should ask sparc and ppc (the other arches that build openoffice) to
> check it builds for them and mark ~sparc/~ppc - should we do that on this bug
> or open new ones?
> 

Actually I've already done that, sort of here:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124229

Sorry, forgot to add you there, also it looks some archs have problems with it
:/

Oh, and the ebuild works fine for me, so closing
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug