First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 124580
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Text-Markup Team <text-markup@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Timothy Bergeron <bugs-gentoo@timothybergeron.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 124580 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 124580 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-03-01 16:25 0000
I installed tetex-2.0.2-r8 last week and it installed fine. Today, I am trying
to reinstall it and I get the following error:


 * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE!  Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is:
 * 
 *   /usr/portage/app-text/tetex/files/tetex-2.0.2-flex-compile.patch
 *   ( tetex-2.0.2-flex-compile.patch )


!!! ERROR: app-text/tetex-2.0.2-r8 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 207, Exitcode 0
!!! Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE!
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

One of my systems that I haven't synced for a bit has a tetex-2.0.2-r8.ebuild
that doesn't try to apply the above patch (which is missing from my portage
tree).

Since tetex-2.0.2-r8 is a stable ebuild, this needs to get fixed quickly. I
came across the problem because tetex is a dependency of t1lib which is in turn
a dependency of kpdf. t1lib depends upon tetex when using the doc USE flag.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-03-02 01:20:35 0000 -------
*** Bug 124609 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #2 From Martin Ehmsen (RETIRED) 2006-03-02 01:54:50 0000 -------
Fixed in CVS. Thanks for reporting.

------- Comment #3 From Carsten Lohrke 2006-03-02 05:50:18 0000 -------
*** Bug 124629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug