First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 124474
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Network Filesystems <net-fs@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Bryce Harrington <bryce@bryceharrington.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
librpcsecgss-0.7.ebuild ebuild for librpcsecgss text/plain Bryce Harrington 2006-02-28 16:16 0000 642 bytes Details
sun-rpc-um license for librpcsecgss text/plain Bryce Harrington 2006-02-28 16:17 0000 2.85 KB Details
librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild text/plain Mario Fetka 2006-06-03 23:42 0000 858 bytes Details
librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild text/plain Mario Fetka 2006-06-08 02:21 0000 788 bytes Details
librpcsecgss-0.12-heimdal.patch librpcsecgss-0.12-heimdal.patch patch Mario Fetka 2006-06-08 02:21 0000 987 bytes Details | Diff
librpcsecgss-0.13.ebuild librpcsecgss-0.13.ebuild text/plain Mario Fetka 2006-06-14 06:00 0000 794 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 124474 depends on: 124473 Show dependency tree
Bug 124474 blocks: 136038
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2006-02-28 16:14 0000 
This is the gssapi implementation file for using NFSv4 securely.  It implements
the rpcsec_gss protocol for NFSv4 to have secure rpc communication.

This requires libgssapi, which I've submitted separately.

A basic ebuild and license will be attached.

------- Comment #1 From Bryce Harrington 2006-02-28 16:16:13 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=81000) [details]
ebuild for librpcsecgss

------- Comment #2 From Bryce Harrington 2006-02-28 16:17:22 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=81001) [details]
license for librpcsecgss

------- Comment #3 From Mario Fetka 2006-06-03 23:42:52 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=88321) [details]
librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild

Update for the ebuild

------- Comment #4 From Mario Fetka 2006-06-08 02:21:21 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=88644) [details]
librpcsecgss-0.12.ebuild

------- Comment #5 From Mario Fetka 2006-06-08 02:21:52 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=88646) [details]
librpcsecgss-0.12-heimdal.patch

------- Comment #6 From SpanKY 2006-06-11 03:21:17 0000 ------- 
wondering who should take this ... or if we should do a dual herd thing ...

------- Comment #7 From Mario Fetka 2006-06-11 22:37:39 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #6)
> wondering who should take this ... or if we should do a dual herd thing ...
> 
i think this is a package for nfs4@gentoo.org

------- Comment #8 From Mario Fetka 2006-06-11 22:41:27 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=88646) [edit] [details]
> librpcsecgss-0.12-heimdal.patch
> 
the reason for this patch ist a dependency tree:
libgssapi --> mit-krb5 --> librpcsecgss --> nfs-utils
or
heimdal --> librpcsecgss --> nfs-utils

------- Comment #9 From Michael Helmling 2006-06-13 10:09:09 0000 ------- 
This ebuild should depend on libgssapi, since it doesn't compile without it.

------- Comment #10 From Mario Fetka 2006-06-13 10:24:07 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #9)
> This ebuild should depend on libgssapi, since it doesn't compile without it.
> 
this ebuild depends on bug 136039 

mit-krb5 doesn't provide libgssapi only his own libgssapi_krb5 (spezial krb5
version)
so mit-krb5 should depend on libgssapi.
if you use heimdal then you already have libgssapi.so.4 so no need to install
libgssapi.so.2
and i think there should not be 2 libs with same functionality on the system.

------- Comment #11 From Michael Helmling 2006-06-13 10:34:12 0000 ------- 
Ah ok. I only installed the bugzilla version of librpcsecgss and not the
mit-krb5 version from here. In this situation I wondered why it didn't depend
on gssapi, but I think now it's clear. :)

------- Comment #12 From Mario Fetka 2006-06-14 06:00:17 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=89146) [details]
librpcsecgss-0.13.ebuild

version bump

------- Comment #13 From Gilles Dartiguelongue 2006-08-01 02:03:42 0000 ------- 
now in portage, shall we close/reassign bug ?

------- Comment #14 From Mario Fetka 2006-08-01 04:47:22 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #13)
> now in portage, shall we close/reassign bug ?
> 
close the bug

------- Comment #15 From SpanKY 2006-08-01 16:10:30 0000 ------- 
in cvs
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug