First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 121466
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug 141206
Assigned To: Gentoo Science Related Packages <sci@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
pari-2.2-non-exec-stack-x86-gentoo.patch files/pari-2.2-non-exec-stack-x86-gentoo.patch patch Marti Raudsepp 2006-02-03 12:21 0000 452 bytes Details | Diff
pari-2.2.12_beta.ebuild pari-2.2.12_beta.ebuild text/plain Marti Raudsepp 2006-02-03 12:22 0000 2.35 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 121466 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 121466 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2006-02-03 12:20 0000
Here's an ebuild for the 2.2.12.beta release of PARI. The ebuild includes the
brand new, snappier GMP kernel support. Note that any programs linked to
libpari will have to be recompiled after toggling the gmp USE flag.

I stripped out some things from the previous pari-2.1.7-r1.ebuild. These seemed
entirely redundant to me, in this version at least, but kick me hard if they
weren't.

I also changed the pari-non-exec-stack-x86-gentoo.patch to work with PARI 2.2.
No docs.patch yet though.

------- Comment #1 From Marti Raudsepp 2006-02-03 12:21:40 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=78826) [details]
files/pari-2.2-non-exec-stack-x86-gentoo.patch

The updated pari-non-exec-stack-x86-gentoo.patch

------- Comment #2 From Marti Raudsepp 2006-02-03 12:22:49 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=78827) [details]
pari-2.2.12_beta.ebuild

*Drumroll* The new ebuild itself. Enjoy!

------- Comment #3 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-07-20 13:52:11 0000 -------

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 141206 ***

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug