Bug 115851 – app-office/{koffice,kword}|kde-base/{kpdf,kdegraphics}: another round of xpdf patches

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Security

[Description Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 05:50:45 UTC]

vendor-sec restricted... *gasp*

[Comment 1 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 05:52:41 UTC]

Created attachment 74936 [details, diff]
post-1.3-koffice-CAN-2005-3193.diff (updated)

[Comment 2 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 05:54:20 UTC]

Created attachment 74937 [details, diff]
post-3.4.3-kdegraphics-CAN-2005-3193.diff (updated)

[Comment 3 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 05:55:21 UTC]

Created attachment 74938 [details]
kword-1.4.2-r6.ebuild

[Comment 4 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 05:56:03 UTC]

Created attachment 74939 [details]
koffice-1.4.2-r6.ebuild

[Comment 5 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 05:56:49 UTC]

Created attachment 74940 [details]
kdegraphics-3.4.3-r3.ebuild

[Comment 6 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 05:57:44 UTC]

Created attachment 74941 [details]
kpdf-3.4.3-r3.ebuild

[Comment 7 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 06:05:12 UTC]

Guys, please test if you have some time left, but the patches should apply cleanly anyways.

[Comment 8 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 06:16:43 UTC]

Quick change of platform in bugzilla. Sorry about the email.

[Comment 9 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 06:23:56 UTC]

no release date yet.

[Comment 10 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 12:04:22 UTC]

Thx carlo. Are these patches fetched from upstream public svn?

[Comment 11 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 13:43:01 UTC]

PPC64 good: all four packages build and run fine with patches being applied.

there is no testcase, is there?

[Comment 12 Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 14:39:15 UTC]

Looks good on hppa and ppc.

[Comment 13 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2005-12-17 23:41:17 UTC]

Looks good on x86

[Comment 14 Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2005-12-18 09:39:38 UTC]

Did any of you who successfully built koffice have postgres support enabled?  I got what looked like a parallel make build failure the first time (second attempt is running as we speak)?

All of the others build find on SPARC

[Comment 15 Marcus D. Hanwell (RETIRED) 2005-12-18 10:36:50 UTC]

Looks good on amd64. If there are any test cases I would be happy to test but no problems compiling or using the apps as normal. Didn't notice any parallel build issues but I don't have postgres support on this system.

[Comment 16 Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2005-12-18 13:57:32 UTC]

koffice built correctly the second time around

[Comment 17 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-20 06:25:48 UTC]

(In reply to comment #10)
> Thx carlo. Are these patches fetched from upstream public svn?
> 

The patches are made by Dirk Mueller and made available via the kde-packager mailing list, but the code is in svn as well - so I am free to commit!?


(In reply to comment #14)
> Did any of you who successfully built koffice have postgres support enabled?  I
> got what looked like a parallel make build failure the first time (second
> attempt is running as we speak)?

I do, but only -j2, so it's not that likely I catch such an issue.


(In reply to comment #15)
> Looks good on amd64. If there are any test cases I would be happy to test but
> no problems compiling or using the apps as normal.

At least none available to me and I'm too lazy to create one.

[Comment 18 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2005-12-20 08:05:18 UTC]

Carlo, if the code is in public svn you are free to commit, but only mention the bug number and this bug will stay restricted until the issue is public.

[Comment 19 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2005-12-20 09:48:07 UTC]

O.k. Knock on wood, that this is the last xpdf issue for at least a year.

<<< koffice-1.4.2-r6.ebuild
<<< kword-1.4.2-r6.ebuild

<<< kdegraphics-3.4.3-r3.ebuild
<<< kpdf-3.4.3-r3.ebuild

[Comment 20 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2005-12-20 10:53:05 UTC]

Thx Carlo. I only think it is reasonable to believe that this is the last round at least this year:-)

Arch Security Liaisons please test and mark stable. Only mention bug number so far.

[Comment 21 Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-12-20 11:48:37 UTC]

ppc done

[Comment 22 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2005-12-20 12:25:18 UTC]

x86 done

[Comment 23 Marcus D. Hanwell (RETIRED) 2005-12-20 12:38:38 UTC]

Stable on amd64 too.

[Comment 24 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2005-12-20 12:47:58 UTC]

stable on ppc64

[Comment 25 Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2005-12-21 06:03:35 UTC]

SPARCy SPARC and the stable bunch

[Comment 26 Jose Luis Rivero (yoswink) (RETIRED) 2005-12-23 19:54:17 UTC]

stable on alpha

[Comment 27 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2006-01-03 07:51:16 UTC]

Opening.

[Comment 28 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2006-01-04 23:22:22 UTC]

GLSA 200601-02