Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 114260
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Science Related Packages <sci@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Patrick Kursawe <phosphan@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
openbabel-2.0.0.ebuild new openbabel text/plain Patrick Kursawe 2005-12-02 05:52 0000 853 bytes Details
openbabel-2.0.0.ebuild openbabel-2.0.0 with blocker for ghemical text/plain Jeffrey Gardner 2006-03-21 18:39 0000 655 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 114260 depends on: 132835 Show dependency tree
Bug 114260 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-12-02 05:40 0000
Current ~x86 ghemical requires openbabel 1 (not stated in DEPEND, but it fails
with openbabel 2), xdrawchem-1.9.9 requires openbabel 2. It would be quite a
PITA to install both openbabel versions parallel, I think. Ideas?

------- Comment #1 From Patrick Kursawe 2005-12-02 05:52:28 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=73941) [details]
new openbabel

ebuild for openbabel-2.0.0

------- Comment #2 From Patrick Kursawe 2005-12-02 05:57:19 0000 -------
for xdrawchem, just copy over the 1.9.8.ebuild and update the required
openbabel
version to 2.0.0.

------- Comment #3 From Donnie Berkholz 2005-12-02 07:03:59 0000 -------
Possibilities:
1) Slot openbabel
2) Make ghemical and xdrawchem block (doesn't make any sense, people want both)
3) Update ghemical to be compatible with openbabel-2

------- Comment #4 From Donnie Berkholz 2005-12-02 07:57:45 0000 -------
I suppose a 4th options is moving (lib)ghemical 1.90 to ~arch, but it probably
shouldn't be going stable so I'd rather not do that.

------- Comment #5 From Patrick Kursawe 2005-12-06 00:47:53 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Possibilities:
> 1) Slot openbabel

Perhaps an idea for the library, but I don't like the idea of having two
parallel versions of the command line tools with symlinks to the currently used
version and all that stuff just for a package that is used for exactly _two_
other packages (IIRC).

> 2) Make ghemical and xdrawchem block (doesn't make any sense, people want both)
> 3) Update ghemical to be compatible with openbabel-2

Perhaps 2.5) make them block until ghemical is updated?

------- Comment #6 From Donnie Berkholz 2005-12-06 00:57:39 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Perhaps 2.5) make them block until ghemical is updated?

Even the latest development version, still not in portage (1.91), depends on
openbabel-1 so that might be a long time.

(http://www.uku.fi/~thassine/ghemical/download.html)

------- Comment #7 From Jeffrey Gardner 2006-03-21 18:39:45 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=82829) [details]
openbabel-2.0.0 with blocker for ghemical

I'm working on an ebuild for gnome-chemistry-utils, which needs this package. I
added a blocker for ghemical (which doesn't work on amd64 anyway).

------- Comment #8 From Jean Bréfort 2006-05-04 08:57:38 0000 -------
ghemical-2.0.0 has been released and is compatible with openbabel-2.0.0
(preferably 2.0.1 since many bugs were fixed) and it works on amd64 :-)

------- Comment #9 From Donald E. Curtis 2006-05-09 15:51:27 0000 -------
Please see my submitted ebuilds <a
href="http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132835">Bug #132835</a>

------- Comment #10 From Donnie Berkholz 2006-05-13 15:29:00 0000 -------
openbabel-2 and ghemical-2 are now committed, so the new xdrawchem can get
added.

------- Comment #11 From Donnie Berkholz 2006-05-14 11:53:35 0000 -------
Fixed.

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug