Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 113950
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Developers for the x86 Architecture <x86@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Michiel de Bruijne <m.debruijne@matrict.nl>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 113950 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 113950 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2005-11-29 14:58 0000
OOo 2.0 is now default on Gentoo, please mark app-office/oooqs-2.0.3-r2 stable
as well, because 
this versions works with OOo 2.0, thanks!

------- Comment #1 From Andreas Proschofsky 2005-11-29 15:02:10 0000 -------
I agree ;) x86-arch what do you think. The same goes for
ooqstart-gnome-0.8.3-r1. Both should be marked stable asap, as the old versions
don't work with OOo 2.0.0

------- Comment #2 From Andreas Proschofsky 2005-11-30 14:02:23 0000 -------
Just want to add that both packages only contain compatibility updates for OOo
2.0 in relation to the current stable releases.

Oh and some fast feedback / decision here would be great ;) as the old
quickstarters won't work with OOo 2.0 (which is stable now), so this should
follow very soon. 

------- Comment #3 From Andreas Proschofsky 2005-12-01 23:04:17 0000 -------
So if there is no interest in this, I'm going to mark both stable myself later
today, as we need it.

------- Comment #4 From Mark Loeser 2005-12-01 23:28:13 0000 -------
Please wait for us to look over the package and test it.  In the future, please
make sure dependencies like this are marked stable first, so we don't have
things broken in the tree.  

I will look at this later today when I get a chance.

------- Comment #5 From Andreas Proschofsky 2005-12-02 05:39:12 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Please wait for us to look over the package and test it.  In the future, please
> make sure dependencies like this are marked stable first, so we don't have
> things broken in the tree.

There might be a slight misunderstanding here: oooqs and ooqstart-gnome are NOT
a dependency for OOo 2.0, on the contrary they depend on OOo 2.0. So it is
impossible to mark them stable first, as this would break things too. Their new
releases won't work with older OpenOffice.org releases as there have been some
fundamental changes in between.

Thanks for looking at them

------- Comment #6 From Paul de Vrieze 2005-12-02 05:42:18 0000 -------
OOoqs is not strictly a dependency of openoffice. It is a helper application
that can be used to speed up the starting of openoffice. It is runtime dependent
on openoffice.

------- Comment #7 From Petteri Räty 2005-12-02 05:42:49 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> 
> There might be a slight misunderstanding here: oooqs and ooqstart-gnome are NOT
> a dependency for OOo 2.0, on the contrary they depend on OOo 2.0. So it is
> impossible to mark them stable first, as this would break things too. Their new
> releases won't work with older OpenOffice.org releases as there have been some
> fundamental changes in between.
> 

You will still file all the bugs at the same time, but you will make these bugs
depend on the openoffice 2.0 stabilization bug. Then we know that there are
things waiting and can stabilize everything at the same time.

------- Comment #8 From Andreas Proschofsky 2005-12-02 08:17:31 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> You will still file all the bugs at the same time, but you will make these bugs
> depend on the openoffice 2.0 stabilization bug. Then we know that there are
> things waiting and can stabilize everything at the same time.

Ok thanks, will try to do better next time.

------- Comment #9 From Mark Loeser 2005-12-04 18:12:52 0000 -------
Both stable on x86

Bug List: (This bug is not in your last search results)   Show last search results      Search page      Enter new bug