First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 112203
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Tuan Van (RETIRED) <langthang@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Tuan Van (RETIRED) <langthang@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 112203 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 112203 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-11-11 10:18 0000 
postfix-2.2.5 in three ~30 days without bug. postfix-2.2.5 include many new
features and enchancement (
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/official/postfix-2.2.5.RELEASE_NOTES
)
It would be nice if you can test and stable on your arch.
@ia64: someone in your team keyword postfix-2.1 without keyword postfix-2.2.
Please test and keyword postfix-2.2

Cheers
langthang

------- Comment #1 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2005-11-11 11:53:57 0000 ------- 
Works great here... marked stable on x86...

------- Comment #2 From Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2005-11-11 13:17:15 0000 ------- 
alpha'lized

Cheers,
Ferdy

------- Comment #3 From Brent Baude 2005-11-11 14:52:34 0000 ------- 
compiled and testing on ppc64, marked stable

------- Comment #4 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2005-11-12 15:43:15 0000 ------- 
Stable on SPARC

------- Comment #5 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-11-13 13:04:02 0000 ------- 
Stable on ppc and hppa.

------- Comment #6 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2005-11-14 05:09:40 0000 ------- 
stable on amd64

------- Comment #7 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2005-11-14 05:09:54 0000 ------- 
stable on amd64

------- Comment #8 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2005-11-14 05:10:32 0000 ------- 
sorry about the reassign, slippery mouse

------- Comment #9 From Benny Pedersen 2006-01-19 04:29:07 0000 ------- 
just found a posible bug in postfix 2.2.5 in the code of postmap

postmap -qv is hardcoded to hash tables :(

so stable :(

postmap -q querystring mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_maps.cf
postmap -qv querystring mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_maps.cf

the last one dont work

------- Comment #10 From Tuan Van (RETIRED) 2006-01-19 08:47:37 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #9)
> just found a posible bug in postfix 2.2.5 in the code of postmap
> 
> postmap -qv is hardcoded to hash tables :(
> 
> so stable :(
> 
> postmap -q querystring mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_maps.cf
> postmap -qv querystring mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_maps.cf
> 
> the last one dont work
> 

WFM
postmap -v -q langthang@example.com mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-maps.cf

------- Comment #11 From Benny Pedersen 2006-01-19 10:03:48 0000 ------- 
that make no diff here

------- Comment #12 From Benny Pedersen 2006-01-19 10:07:46 0000 ------- 
hmm, wonderfull

postmap -v -q querystring maptype:/etc/postfix/mapfile

works

swap -v -q fails

------- Comment #13 From Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2006-01-19 10:15:02 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #12)
> swap -v -q fails

Yeah, try swapping random letters in "postmap" and try a command like:

soptpam -v -q querystring maptype:/etc/postfix/mapfile

Fails doesn't it ? I wouldn't be surprised.

That being said, pretty please, stop spamming.

Cheers,
Ferdy

------- Comment #14 From Joshua Kinard 2006-02-19 17:52:12 0000 ------- 
mips stable.

------- Comment #15 From Tuan Van (RETIRED) 2006-02-19 19:20:06 0000 ------- 
done.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug