First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 105527
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: UPSTREAM
Assigned To: Sparc Porters <sparc@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Marcelo Goes <vanquirius@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 105527 depends on: 105447 Show dependency tree
Bug 105527 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2005-09-10 13:14 0000 
Hello,

I just broke off dev-libs/libnl from the bmon ebuild and was forced to drop arch
keywords.
This should not be hard to test.
Emerge bmon-2.1.0-r1 and check if its configure output correctly detects libnl.
Also, try running the bmon binary.

If everything works ok (and it really should, considering libnl was already
being built inside bmon's ebuild anyway), please keyword dev-libs/libnl and
net-analyzer/bmon.

Affected arches: amd64, hppa, ppc and sparc.

Thanks,
Marcelo

------- Comment #1 From postmodern 2005-09-11 05:09:52 0000 ------- 
I'll be happy to test it once the ebuild hits the portage mirrors, so far
bmon-2.1.0 and bmon-2.1.0-r2 are the only ebuilds available.

------- Comment #2 From Marcelo Goes 2005-09-11 09:07:36 0000 ------- 
Thanks, postmodern.
I actually bumped -r1 to -r2 because of the change in installed contents, so -r2
is the way to go.

------- Comment #3 From Tobias Scherbaum 2005-09-18 08:41:36 0000 ------- 
Added to ~ppc

------- Comment #4 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-10-04 14:16:23 0000 ------- 
we're currently testing a new alias system, sorry for the bugspam

------- Comment #5 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-10-08 04:59:29 0000 ------- 
amd64 is happy

------- Comment #6 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2005-11-19 13:30:12 0000 ------- 
Getting bus issues here on sparc.  Seems to be related to a difference in
~sparc
and sparc systems as its not specific to the version you want us to keyword.

------- Comment #7 From Jeroen Roovers 2006-01-04 07:48:45 0000 ------- 
Marked ~hppa.

------- Comment #8 From Markus Ullmann 2007-02-01 19:00:25 0000 ------- 
sparc: situation changed in the mean time?

------- Comment #9 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2007-02-01 19:18:57 0000 ------- 
It's broken, probably unaligned memory accesses which sparc userland doesn't
like.
This will cause the usual SIGBUS. Unkeyworded and closing.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug