| Bug#: 97636 | Product: Gentoo Linux | Version: unspecified | Platform: All |
| OS/Version: Linux | Status: RESOLVED | Severity: normal | Priority: P2 |
| Resolution: FIXED | Assigned To: net-mail@gentoo.org | Reported By: albert+gentoo-bugzilla@cdr.se | |
| Component: Applications | |||
| URL: | |||
| Summary: mail-client/mailx license not same as listed at debian.org | |||
| Keywords: | |||
| Status Whiteboard: | |||
| Opened: 2005-07-01 10:43 0000 | |||
| Description: | Opened: 2005-07-01 10:43 0000 |
mail-client/mailx ebuild specifies LICENSE="GPL-2" and HOMEPAGE="http://www. debian.org". The package at debian seems to be http://packages.debian.org/ stable/mail/mailx as the versioning theme seems similar. Debian lists this mailx package as using the OpenBSD license. Is the use of the GPL-2 license a bug? Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: There is also a mailx binary included in net-mail/mailutils that is the GNU mailutils which is GPL-2 licensed.
The mailx license (I have looked at one in header of its main.c, since I didn't
find any license text file in the dist tarball) is almost identical to our
${PORTDIR}/licenses/BSD, except for being copyrighted to "Regents of University
of California", usage of "University" instead of generic "<ORGANIZATION>, and
usage of "Regents" instead of "COPYRIGHT HOLDERS" in disclaimer.
Looks like it's pretty much a BSD license. I'll change the ebuilds accordingly.
Thanks for the heads-up, Albert.