Bug 83448 - When I emerged app-i18n/imhangul on AMD64, it didn't work correctly.
|
Bug#:
83448
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: AMD64
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: normal
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: amd64@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: jinhyung@gmail.com
|
|
Component: Applications
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: When I emerged app-i18n/imhangul on AMD64, it didn't work correctly.
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2005-02-27 02:14 0000
|
When I emerged app-i18n/imhangul on AMD64, it didn't work correctly.
Because current ebuild dose not create gtk.immodules in /etc/gtk-2.0/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/ and symbolic links for "im-hangul.la" and "im-hangul.so" in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules.
<HowTO FIX>
# cp /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules /etc/gtk-2.0/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/
# ln -s /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules/im-hangul.la /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-hangul.la
# ln -s /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules/im-hangul.so /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-hangul.so
And, I also added a ~amd64 keyword, because it works fine on several amd64 machines in korea. I think it can get an amd64 keyword, but well, i don't know whether i can add it or not.
here is a patch.
http://jenix.xecurity.net/patch/imhangul-0.9.11.ebuild.patch
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. cp /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules /etc/gtk-2.0/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/
2. ln -s /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules/im-hangul.la /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-hangul.la
3. ln -s /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/immodules/im-hangul.so /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/immodules/im-hangul.so
Actual Results:
Now, imhangul works fine :)
Thanks for the bug report. I added a fix for amd64 platform similar
to what other immodules do (copying gtk.imodules file and symlinking
libraries is not an option here). It should work on amd64, but as I
couldn't test it I reassign the bug to amd64 herd.
amd64 team: please test imhangul-0.9.11-r1.ebuild and add ~amd64
keyword.
this breaks it for the rest of us...
you know what... scratch my last two comments.. things work fine on x86...
:embarassed:
