Bug 83136 - app-editors/emacs-cvs should be masked
Bug#: 83136 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: major Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: emacs@gentoo.org Reported By: salivian@gmail.com
Component: Applications
URL: 
Summary: app-editors/emacs-cvs should be masked
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2005-02-23 20:51 0000
Description:   Opened: 2005-02-23 20:51 0000 
as subject.

emerging 21.3.50 -> 22.0.50 as I think 22 becomes the main stream in CVS now.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2005-02-24 19:24:02 0000 ------- 
emacs-21.3.50.ebuild has "x86 ppc sparc ~amd64" keywords,
so emacs-22.0.50.ebuild should be marked stable on x86, ppc, and sparc
before removing emacs-21.3.50.ebuild. 

ppc and sparc team: please mark emacs-22.0.50.ebuild stable on your arch.

------- Comment #2 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2005-02-26 19:29:03 0000 ------- 
Sparctastic

------- Comment #3 From Joe Jezak 2005-03-05 00:55:48 0000 ------- 
Marked ppc stable.

------- Comment #4 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2005-03-05 06:22:23 0000 ------- 
Thanks. Removed emacs-cvs-21.3.50.ebuild from CVS.

------- Comment #5 From Mark Loeser 2006-01-10 18:12:33 0000 ------- 
Why is this ebuild stable?  Its a CVS ebuild, therefore, can't be considered
"stable".  We should throw this back to atleast ~arch for everyone, if not
KEYWORDS="-*".

------- Comment #6 From Dan 2006-01-11 04:44:16 0000 ------- 
Based on some reasearch, it has to do with bug 22225, which is now fixed.


http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-editors/emacs-cvs/emacs-cvs-21.3.50.ebuild?hideattic=0&rev=1.28&view=log

------- Comment #7 From Mark Loeser 2006-02-24 21:44:06 0000 ------- 
emacs-cvs-22.0.50 is stable on a few archs.  As far as I can tell this is a
live CVS ebuild.  Why are any of these unmasked?

------- Comment #8 From Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) 2006-02-25 10:53:35 0000 ------- 
Did you fail to read the hint posted in Comment #6?

------- Comment #9 From Ciaran McCreesh 2006-02-25 10:59:03 0000 ------- 
That hasn't been an issue for a very long time.

------- Comment #10 From Mark Loeser 2006-02-25 12:31:39 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #8)
> Did you fail to read the hint posted in Comment #6?
> 

I don't see how comment #6 is related.  There are live CVS ebuilds in the tree
that are not package.masked.  If I'm wrong, someone please correct me.

------- Comment #11 From Matthew Kennedy (RETIRED) 2006-02-25 14:57:53 0000 ------- 
I removed the ebuild containing stable keywords.

app-editors/emacs-cvs won't be package.masked however.