Bug 8313 - ut2003demo 1080c must be applied on top of 1080b
|
Bug#:
8313
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: x86
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: normal
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: vapier@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: kode54@earthlink.net
|
|
Component: Games
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: ut2003demo 1080c must be applied on top of 1080b
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2002-09-24 10:54 0000
|
1080c doesn't appear to be a stand-alone patch.
The server browser is obviously missing the jittery sorting fix, which is part
of the 1080b update. Apparently, they decided not to make 1080c a cumulative
patch.
I have already made an ebuild myself, the process is as simple as applying both
patches in order, but I leave that up to you in the event that you find a
cleaner way of arranging the ebuild. I'll upload and link later if it becomes
necessary.
if you post the ebuild we'll take a look at it
phoenix: im stealing this one since (1) i put out the 1080c patch and (2) i
have an ebuild that works
Heyas Spanky,
you didnt change too much did you? I looked into the ebuild but i was unable to
find any new, major enhancements (no offense there) - if you implemented a major
change (layout,whatever..) please tell me. Sorry for not taking care of that
stuff myself, i lost 512MB ram yesterday so i had quite some downtime (crappy
noname ram, dont you ever buy that). Thanks for your help,
-phoen][x-
besides, what do you mean with "(2) i have an ebuild that works" - mine worked,
didnt it?
i just abstracted your code ...
basically i defined 'PATCH1' and 'PATCH2' and rewrote bits in a for loop ...
for PATCH in $PATCH1 $PATCH2 ; do
<patch code>
done
i use a lot of noname ram ;)
well, pc133 i do ... got about 2+gigs of it in 2 servers
my desktop though has the good stuff for pc333 :D
