Bug 83124 - net-misc/gfax-0.7.2.2.ebuild (update)
|
Bug#:
83124
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: All
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: enhancement
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: genstef@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: yselkowitz@hotmail.com
|
|
Component: Applications
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: net-misc/gfax-0.7.2.2.ebuild (update)
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2005-02-23 18:34 0000
|
There's a new version of gfax available upstream. The package is now
autotooled, so I made a new ebuild and patch for this version, attached below.
Since the current stable version of dbus, which is built w/o mono support, is
newer then any testing releases that do have, I specified --disable-dbus. When
that situation changes, I guess this can change too.
Curious, but how did your ebuild work without a sandbox violation? The main
point of the patch was to remove the gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule which
was being called during make all. I only changed the eprefix since I was
already making a patch, although your way is cleaner.
And is that einfo in pkg_postinst necessary now that the schemas are installed
into the global schemas dir, where gnome2_pkg_postinst will automatically
install it?
BTW, although the upstream version is advertised as 0.7.2, but the tarball is
0.7.2-2; I don't know how likely it is, but what happens if there's a 0.7.2-3
tarball? That's why I versioned mine as I did.
> Curious, but how did your ebuild work without a sandbox violation? The main
> point of the patch was to remove the gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule which
> was being called during make all. I only changed the eprefix since I was
> already making a patch, although your way is cleaner.
I dont know .. I never had that gconf2tool-sandbox-violation.
> And is that einfo in pkg_postinst necessary now that the schemas are installed
> into the global schemas dir, where gnome2_pkg_postinst will automatically
> install it?
I think its not needed now .. but I am not sure so I left it in .. if it has reseived a better testing I think we can remove it
> BTW, although the upstream version is advertised as 0.7.2, but the tarball is
> 0.7.2-2; I don't know how likely it is, but what happens if there's a 0.7.2-3
> tarball? That's why I versioned mine as I did.
I wwill then add a new ebuild 0.7.2.3 and do it like in your ebuild.
But I sure hope he wont make a "-3" :)
Anyway the ebuild is now in portage :)
Well, there's now a 0.7.3 version, and get this, the source tarball is named
gfax-0.7.3-1.tar.gz.
(If you see the website, the href's of the words "Sources tarball" and the
corresponding icon are different.)
version bumped, thanks. I also added your patch because I got another report of
sandbox violations .. although I never had them.