Bug 79300 - evolution-sharp-0.6.ebuild (New ebuild)
|
Bug#:
79300
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: All
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: enhancement
|
Priority: P5
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: dsd@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: kzimmerm@gentoo.org
|
|
Component: Ebuilds
|
|
|
URL:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/beagle/
|
|
Summary: evolution-sharp-0.6.ebuild (New ebuild)
|
|
Keywords: EBUILD
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2005-01-24 01:51 0000
|
This is the evolution .NET binding. Beagle (67768) can use it as a plugin.
kai
Created an attachment (id=49346) [details]
evolution-sharp-0.6.ebuild
Well, this one is based on a CVS snapshot. Beagle only accepts 0.6 or higher,
the newest offcial release is 0.4
I know the SRC_URI has to be changed :)
kai
The new ebuild was successfully built on x86 (mono 1.0.5-r3, gtk-sharp-1.0.4*).
Not sure if gtkhtml is really a req (there's already a gtkhtml-sharp), or if that part of configure.in is copied from evolution; I suspect the latter.
Now mono is in /dev-lang/mono.
The last version of the ebuild is bad
Created an attachment (id=53676) [details]
Updated evolution-sharp for the updated mono location
Here is an ebuild which works for the latest mono, which got relocated to
dev-lang/mono. It worked and compiled cleanly for me.
">=dev-dotnet/mono-0.91" is a invalid ebuild dependencies,
mono ebuild as moved under "dev-lang" in a portage tree.
correct dependencies is:
">=dev-lang/mono-0.91"
It worked okay for me, I have no idea what you're tlaking about...
You could just add the 0.7 ebuild to the tree to resolve this issue.
Yaron: "It works for me" is *never* sufficient reason to discount someone's
(informed, I'd assume since they're a gentoo dev) assessment of a situation.
Furthermore, adding an ebuild to portage just to resolve one more bug is *not*
how a stable portage tree is maintained. The ebuild will be added when a
maintainer/herd who is willing to handle all the bugs/bumps/features takes on
the package. No sooner.
(I'm not trying to be an *ss, and I may have misinterpreted the tone of your
comment, so feel free to smack me if your intentions were otherwise.)
Looks like it's going to be me that maintains this at least initially. I'd
appreciate it if any gnome/gentopia/mono developers could help out.