Bug 76809 - nautilus 2.8.2 does not recognize scripts in folder "nautilus-scripts"
Bug#: 76809 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: gnome@gentoo.org Reported By: webmail@aaron.bohannon.name
Component: GNOME
URL: 
Summary: nautilus 2.8.2 does not recognize scripts in folder "nautilus-scripts"
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2005-01-05 12:53 0000
Description:   Opened: 2005-01-05 12:53 0000
Nautilus 2.8.2-r1 (and perhaps other 2.8 versions) does not recognize scripts
that are placed in the "~/.gnome2/nautilus-scripts" directory.  My scripts were
working fine in 2.6 and were no longer recognized after the upgrade, nor did
they work in a freshly installed Gentoo OS with Nautilus 2.8.2.  If there is a
subdirectory in the nautilus-scripts folder, then nautilus will display the
"Scripts" menu item and will show the subdirectory in the menu, but will not
show any of the executable scripts in the top-level scripts directory or any of
the subdirectories.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Put an executable file in the folder "~/.gnome2/nautilus-scripts".
2. Check the File menu in Nautilus.


Actual Results:  
There is no "Scripts" menu item.

Expected Results:  
There should be a "Scripts" menu item with the name of the script in a submenu.

Portage 2.0.51-r3 (default-linux/x86/2004.3, gcc-3.3.4,
glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1,
2.6.9-gentoo-r13 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.9-gentoo-r13 i686 Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU
1.70GHzGentoo Base System version 1.4.16
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r5
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r1
Binutils: sys-devel/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1
Headers:  sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.4.21-r1
Libtools: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.2-r5
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fprefetch-loop-arrays -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER=""
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config
/usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/
/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/
/usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf
/etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-fprefetch-loop-arrays -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks fixpackages sandbox sfperms"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://gentoo.mirrors.pair.com/"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 X aac acpi aim alsa apache2 apm avi berkdb bitmap-fonts crypt cups
divx4linux doc encode esd exif fam flac foomaticdb fortran gdbm gif gnome gpm
gstreamer gtk gtk2 imagemagick ipv6 java jpeg libwww mad mikmod mmx motif
mozilla mozsvg mpeg msn ncurses offensive oggvorbis opengl pam pcmcia pdflib
perl php png pnp ppds python quicktime readline recode samba scanner sdl sox
speex spell sse ssl svg tcltk tcpd tetex theora tiff truetype unicode usb
vim-with-x wavelan xinerama xml xml2 xmms xv yahoo zlib"

------- Comment #1 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2005-01-10 20:00:06 0000 -------
I have a funny feeling that this is missing from 2.8 versions of nautilus, I
think I read it somewhere, needs investigation.

------- Comment #2 From Joe McCann (RETIRED) 2005-01-11 00:09:23 0000 -------
Scripts work fine for me with latest versions of nautilus

------- Comment #3 From Andreas Volz 2005-01-12 10:15:07 0000 -------
*** Bug 77713 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #4 From TGL 2005-01-15 10:19:14 0000 -------
According to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153734 the issue comes
from shared-mime-info-0.14, and should be fixed by 0.15 (which is masked in
portage).

------- Comment #5 From foser (RETIRED) 2005-01-15 10:59:17 0000 -------
see bug #66195 for what needs to be done.

------- Comment #6 From foser (RETIRED) 2005-03-02 14:12:34 0000 -------
well #66195 .. no testreplies on that one.. assume since noone is complaining
that it got fixed.

Marked 0.14-r2 x86 stable.