Bug 69092 - fung-calc fails to emerge
Bug#: 69092 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: kde@gentoo.org Reported By: web@clownswilleatyou.com
Component: KDE
URL: 
Summary: fung-calc fails to emerge
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2004-10-26 20:38 0000
Description:   Opened: 2004-10-26 20:38 0000
I attempted to emerge fung-calc 1.3.2b and received the following error in
configure:

checking for KDE... libraries /usr/kde/3.3/lib, headers /usr/kde/3.3/include
checking for KDE paths... defaults
checking for dcopidl... /usr/kde/3.3/bin/dcopidl
checking for dcopidl2cpp... /usr/kde/3.3/bin/dcopidl2cpp
checking for mcopidl... not found
configure: error: The important program mcopidl was not found!
Please check whether you installed aRts correctly.

I do not use aRts, so I do not have it installed.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge fung-calc

Actual Results:  
fung-calc failed to emerge

Expected Results:  
It should have emerged.

brook root # emerge info
Portage 2.0.51-r2 (default-x86-2004.0, gcc-3.3.4, glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1,
2.6.9
i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.9 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1300MHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
distcc 2.16 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [enabled]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r5
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r1
Binutils: sys-devel/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1
Headers:  sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.4.21-r1
Libtools: sys-devel/libtool-1.5.2-r5
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium3 -pipe -frename-registers -fomit-frame-pointer
-fforce-addr -s -falign-functions=64 -fprefetch-loop-arrays -mfpmath=sse
-maccumulate-outgoing-args"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER=""
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown
/usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium3 -pipe -frename-registers -fomit-frame-pointer
-fforce-addr -s -falign-functions=64 -fprefetch-loop-arrays -mfpmath=sse
-maccumulate-outgoing-args -fpermissive"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs ccache distcc distlocks sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.osuosl.org
http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
MAKEOPTS="-j4"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="X acpi alsa apm audiofile avi berkdb bitmap-fonts cdparanoia cdr cups
divx4linux dvd encode ext3 f77 fbcon flac foomaticdb gcj gdbm gif gpm gtk gtk2
imap imlib java jpeg kde libg++ libwww mad mikmod mmx mmx2 motif mpeg msn
ncurses nlsoggvorbis ooo-kde opengl oss pam pcmcia pda pdflib perl png python
qt
qtmt quicktime radeon readline real samba sdl slang speex spell sse ssl svga
tcltk tcpd tiff truetype usb wifi x86 xine xml2 xmms xprint xv xvid zlib"

------- Comment #1 From Simone Gotti (RETIRED) 2004-10-27 02:30:51 0000 -------
Can you test the attached ebuild and patch? Thanks.

@ SCI herd:

I've rewrited the ebuild to use the kde.eclass, If it works and you think that it's right I'll commit it. Does a revbump is needed for the fact that I've change a big part of it? I'm not sure because revbumping it will make people that already have it installed reemergin again it without any gain...

------- Comment #2 From Simone Gotti (RETIRED) 2004-10-27 02:31:47 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=42675) [details]
fung-calc-1.3.2b.ebuild

------- Comment #3 From Simone Gotti (RETIRED) 2004-10-27 05:41:13 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=42687) [details]
fung-calc-1.3.2b-configure.patch

Ehm... I was sure to have already attached it...

------- Comment #4 From Kit Fenderson-Peters 2004-10-27 06:11:18 0000 -------
That looks to have fixed it.  There's still an issue with color display, but
I'll file a new bug for that.

------- Comment #5 From Simone Gotti (RETIRED) 2004-10-27 06:29:39 0000 -------
Good!

@SCI herd, can you take a look at the ebuild? should I commit it as r0 or should I revbump it? 

------- Comment #6 From Donnie Berkholz 2004-10-27 11:08:46 0000 -------
Should be fine to commit with no bump. It's a compile fix and other changes
invisible to the user.

Ebuild hasn't been committed so this shouldn't be closed.

------- Comment #7 From Simone Gotti (RETIRED) 2004-10-27 14:15:30 0000 -------
Thanks Donnie for your suggestion, I've commited it in CVS.