Bug 62414 - Katoob : Version bump + new ebuild
Bug#: 62414 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: leonardop@gentoo.org Reported By: afw2000@hotmail.com
Component: Ebuilds
URL:  http://http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=katoob
Summary: Katoob : Version bump + new ebuild
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2004-08-31 12:29 0000
Description:   Opened: 2004-08-31 12:29 0000
a version bump + fixed the ebuild a little.


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Ahmed Farid 2004-08-31 12:35:28 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=38606) [details]
the new ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Martin Seifert 2004-09-01 05:13:40 0000 -------
There is a typo (missing space) in the ebuild at line 13.

gtkhtml? (x11-libs/gtksourceview )

should be 

gtkhtml? ( x11-libs/gtksourceview )

Works fine for me on ~x86, thanks.

------- Comment #3 From Ahmed Farid 2004-09-01 11:49:14 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=38700) [details]
fixed ebuild

Fixed the typo pointed out by Martin Seifert.
*note to self, learn how to use repoman*

------- Comment #4 From Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED) 2004-09-06 23:43:49 0000 -------
A new ebuild for katoob-0.3.8 is now in the tree. Thank you for your report.

A few comments on your ebuild:

* The KEYWORDS variable should only be populated for the arches you can actually test for. That usually means x86 initially, and then different arch maintainers/devs can add some other arches as they see fit.

* The `cups' and `gtkhtml' USE flags don't make sense. Maybe something like `printing' and `highlighting', or even `pango' and `gtksourceview' would be more appropriate, but as we don't have such flags, I decided to enable those options by default.

* The `nls' hack is not consistent with the package's configure script. Therefore I chose to avoid it.

Anyway, note that the final ebuild in the tree is a modified version of this, and your effort is very appreciated. Thanks again. :)