Bug 62018 - Please test and mark webapp-config v1.10-r10 stable on your arch
Bug#: 62018 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: All Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: stuart@gentoo.org Reported By: stuart@gentoo.org
Component: Applications
URL: 
Summary: Please test and mark webapp-config v1.10-r10 stable on your arch
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2004-08-28 02:26 0000
Description:   Opened: 2004-08-28 02:26 0000
v1.10-r10 includes an important fix for incorrect permissions on cgi-bin's, and
some extra options in the config file to better control permissions.

Any problems, please let me know.

Thanks,
Stu

------- Comment #1 From Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2004-08-28 06:36:26 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=38389) [details]
Patch to make webapp-config-1.10-r10 CONF_LIBDIR aware

Stuart: As portage-2.0.51 is in front of the door, I'd like to have all Gentoo
apps to be CONF_LIBDIR aware when they go stable on amd64. Attached patch does
this for webapp-config-1.10-r10. Further the ebuild needs some sed magic. I'd
like to have a

sed -i -e "s:/lib/:/$(get_libdir)/:g"

applied on the ebuild (+inherit eutils). Can we go for these changes in
1.10-r10 ?

------- Comment #2 From Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) 2004-08-28 12:17:14 0000 -------
Sure, happy to oblige.  I'll commit it as a -r11.  This will be the only change
from -r10.

Best regards,
Stu

------- Comment #3 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2004-08-31 14:49:41 0000 -------
-r10 sparc stable but leaving on the cc for -r11.

------- Comment #4 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2004-09-03 15:54:02 0000 -------
-r10 stable on alpha.

------- Comment #5 From Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2004-09-03 17:22:33 0000 -------
hmm, just marked -r10 stable.

Stu: Please, when you issue -r11 and the only change is the libdir patch from above then mark it stable on amd64 from the beginning.

------- Comment #6 From Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) 2004-09-19 09:44:42 0000 -------
webapp-config v1.10-r11 is now in Portage.

------- Comment #7 From Tom Gall 2004-09-26 21:01:06 0000 -------
this was taken care of some time ago. (bug #59756)