Summary: | >=dev-ruby/minitest-pretty_diff-0.1 >=dev-ruby/minitest-bonus-assertions-2.0 >=dev-ruby/mime-types-3.0-r1 keyword request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Hans de Graaff <graaff> |
Component: | Keywording | Assignee: | Gentoo Ruby Team <ruby> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | KEYWORDREQ |
Priority: | Normal | Flags: | stable-bot:
sanity-check+
|
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
dev-ruby/minitest-pretty_diff-0.1 ia64 ppc x86
dev-ruby/minitest-bonus-assertions-2.0 ia64 ppc x86
dev-ruby/minitest-bonus-assertions-3.0 ia64 ppc x86
dev-ruby/mime-types-3.1 ia64 ppc x86
dev-ruby/minitest-hooks-1.4.2
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
~amd64-linux ~x86-linux ~ppc-macos ~x64-macos ~x86-macos ~sparc-solaris ~sparc64-solaris ~x64-solaris ~x86-solaris done. Can we get a /complete/ list of packages? dependency.bad [fatal] 14 dev-ruby/mime-types/mime-types-3.0-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) [ '>=dev-ruby/mime-types-data-3.2015:3[ruby_targets_ruby20]', '>=dev-ruby/mime-types-data-3.2015:3[ruby_targets_ruby21]'] (In reply to Tobias Klausmann from comment #2) > Can we get a /complete/ list of packages? > > dependency.bad [fatal] 14 > dev-ruby/mime-types/mime-types-3.0-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: > alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) > [ '>=dev-ruby/mime-types-data-3.2015:3[ruby_targets_ruby20]', > '>=dev-ruby/mime-types-data-3.2015:3[ruby_targets_ruby21]'] I'm not sure how this would occur since dev-ruby/mime-types-data already has an alpha keyword. (In reply to Hans de Graaff from comment #3) > (In reply to Tobias Klausmann from comment #2) > > Can we get a /complete/ list of packages? > > > > dependency.bad [fatal] 14 > > dev-ruby/mime-types/mime-types-3.0-r1.ebuild: DEPEND: > > alpha(default/linux/alpha/13.0) > > [ '>=dev-ruby/mime-types-data-3.2015:3[ruby_targets_ruby20]', > > '>=dev-ruby/mime-types-data-3.2015:3[ruby_targets_ruby21]'] > > I'm not sure how this would occur since dev-ruby/mime-types-data already has > an alpha keyword. My bad, I used "alpha" instead of "~alpha" All three keyworded accordingly. Also, sorry for the grumpy tone, it was uncalled for. ~arm added *** Bug 588796 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Marked ~hppa ~ppc64. An automated check of this bug failed - the following atoms are unknown: dev-ruby/minitest-bonus-assertions-2.0:2 dev-ruby/minitest-bonus-assertions-3.0:2 dev-ruby/minitest-pretty_diff-0.1:0 dev-ruby/mime-types-3.1:3 dev-ruby/mime-types-3.0-r1:3 dev-ruby/mime-types-3.0:3 Please verify the atom list. An automated check of this bug succeeded - the previous repoman errors are now resolved. add ~ppc keyword. ~ia64 keyworded An automated check of this bug failed - the following atom is unknown: dev-ruby/mime-types-3.0-r1 Please verify the atom list. An automated check of this bug succeeded - the previous repoman errors are now resolved. Package list updated to help tatt. x86 keyworded, closing |
Due to a missing test dependency your keywords have been dropped. Please test and readd them on the following packages: >=dev-ruby/minitest-pretty_diff-0.1 >=dev-ruby/minitest-bonus-assertions-2.0 >=dev-ruby/mime-types-3.0-r1