Summary: | [gmt] Missing masters= specification | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Infrastructure | Reporter: | Michał Górny <mgorny> |
Component: | Gentoo Overlays | Assignee: | Greg Turner <gmt> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 552950 |
Description
Michał Górny
2015-06-23 18:59:11 UTC
(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #0) > Our automated repository checks [1] have detected that the 'gmt' > repository lacks masters= specification... [snip] > In particular, [snip], it needs to > specify in metadata/layout.conf: > > masters = gentoo It does. But, this is abandon-repo for ages; any end-user-facing surfaces are likely doing slight harm by cluttering up people's search-results and so forth, without giving any benefit. So I'd prefer if we could flag it as non-published, for now (assuming it shows up in the big layman list-of-repos), anyhow, in the interest of maximizing SNR for humans. When/if I clean it out and put any useful stuff there, I can just bug infra to re-add it, again. Alternatively, I'd be happy to just disappear all the content except the required boilerplate, which would save infra the hassle, but continue to negatively impact the OOTB layman overlay-list SNR -- really not a huge tragedy. (In reply to Gregory Turner from comment #1) > (In reply to Michał Górny from comment #0) > > Our automated repository checks [1] have detected that the 'gmt' > > repository lacks masters= specification... > [snip] > > In particular, [snip], it needs to > > specify in metadata/layout.conf: > > > > masters = gentoo > > It does. Nope, there's not even a 'metadata' directory there :). Maybe you forgot to push? :) https://cgit.gentoo.org/user/gmt.git/tree/ > But, this is abandon-repo for ages; any end-user-facing surfaces are likely > doing slight harm by cluttering up people's search-results and so forth, > without giving any benefit. > > So I'd prefer if we could flag it as non-published, for now (assuming it > shows up in the big layman list-of-repos), anyhow, in the interest of > maximizing SNR for humans. Well, I see that we share a similar view :). I've removed the repo from the public (layman) list via commit a8dfba0ffc658cb2ea. The git repository itself is still live, and if you want it republished, just ping someone to do 'git revert a8dfba0ffc658cb2ea' in api-gentoo-org :). Thanks. |