Bug 54988 - Ebuild: mozilla-sunbird-bin-0.0.20040602.ebuild
|
Bug#:
54988
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: All
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: minor
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: mozilla@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: patrik@yes.nu
|
|
Component: Ebuilds
|
|
|
URL:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/sunbird.html
|
|
Summary: Ebuild: mozilla-sunbird-bin-0.0.20040602.ebuild
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2004-06-24 02:35 0000
|
The Sunbird Project is a redesign of the Mozilla Calendar component.
Hrm, is this stuff going to make its way into portage anytime soon? :)
Probably not, I think portage wants a better versioning than YYYYMMDD
There's a new 20040701 release, but the tarballs have the same name and I don't
know how much work that should be done with this until the SunBird team has
begun versioning better.
My issue is that I've got interest at my new workplace to arrange a migration
from Exchange / Outlook to the Mozilla Suite of independant apps. Sunbird would
be a pretty good replacement for the type of calendaring people here are doing,
if there was some packages that were easily deployable somewhere.
Also, I think just the link off their project page is to a same-named file. If
you look in their directory structure, you should just as easily be able to get
the file from:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/sunbird/nightly/2004-07-01/MozillaSunbird-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz
which would be a little more inline with how portage builds source URLs.
But, I can understand wanting to wait for an official numbered release. :)
Yes, well the problem isn't really with the URL. If you check the ebuild I have
that same path, except I don't parse the date from the name of the ebuild file.
It's with the tarball name (MozillaSunbird-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz) which
always is the same.
This makes it hard for the distfiles mirrors to mirror that file, unless the
gentoo-devs rename it.
Ahh yes, right, I could see how that would cause problems. And nobody wants to
have custom exceptions in the mirroring scripts. :(
Oh well, I guess I'll just have to resign myself to manual installation for the
time being. ;)
*** Bug 46799 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Their "official beta" is still coming from a nightly directory. Running it
demonstrates that there are still a lot of problems. Additionally they're not
making source snapshots available yet.
I put it in portage but it's going to stay package.mask'd until a better
release is made. To use it immediately:
mkdir -p /etc/portage
echo app-office/mozilla-sunbird-bin >> /etc/portage/package.unmask
echo app-office/mozilla-sunbird-bin ~x86 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
emerge mozilla-sunbird-bin
*** Bug 61082 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
A new build is out. 200040907.
I re-named the package and it almost worked, since the download file has the same name, you have to delete the file from distfiles otherwise it thinks you have already downloaded the package and all you end up doing is installing the 20040814 again :P and if you delete and download the right one after you ran the digest, it doesn't work either :D
So basically, just a rename and a file deletion works.