Summary: | =app-crypt/gpa-0.9.9: stable request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) <alonbl> |
Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | Crypto team [DISABLED] <crypto+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alonbl, polynomial-c |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | Flags: | kensington:
sanity-check+
|
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
=app-crypt/gpa-0.9.9
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
Bug Depends on: | 533350 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED)
2014-11-17 12:44:26 UTC
emerge -1 =app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5 pulls unstable deps: # required by app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5 # required by gpa (argument) =app-crypt/gpgme-1.5.3 ~amd64 (In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #1) > emerge -1 =app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5 pulls unstable deps: > > # required by app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5 > # required by gpa (argument) > =app-crypt/gpgme-1.5.3 ~amd64 right, let's stabilize it as well, opening. When running =app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5 a window appears with the following message: "The GPGME library returned an unexpected error at keytable.c: 150. The error was: Unknown option This is either an installation problem or a bug in GPA. GPA will now try to recover from this error." And the application hangs. Anything I am doing wrong? Thanks. (In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #3) > Anything I am doing wrong? No, it took me a while to reproduce, the gpgme-1.5.3 assumes gpgsm-2.1 and send a command that is not supported. I opened a bug[1]. I will revert the stable of gpgme. [1] https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1795 (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #4) > (In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #3) > > Anything I am doing wrong? > > No, it took me a while to reproduce, the gpgme-1.5.3 assumes gpgsm-2.1 and > send a command that is not supported. I opened a bug[1]. > > I will revert the stable of gpgme. > > [1] https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1795 gpgme-1.5.5 should resolve it, can you please check? (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #5) > (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #4) > > (In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #3) > > > Anything I am doing wrong? > > > > No, it took me a while to reproduce, the gpgme-1.5.3 assumes gpgsm-2.1 and > > send a command that is not supported. I opened a bug[1]. > > > > I will revert the stable of gpgme. > > > > [1] https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1795 > > gpgme-1.5.5 should resolve it, can you please check? working for me. (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #6) > (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #5) > > (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #4) > > > (In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #3) > > > > Anything I am doing wrong? > > > > > > No, it took me a while to reproduce, the gpgme-1.5.3 assumes gpgsm-2.1 and > > > send a command that is not supported. I opened a bug[1]. > > > > > > I will revert the stable of gpgme. > > > > > > [1] https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1795 > > > > gpgme-1.5.5 should resolve it, can you please check? > > working for me. Maybe we can finally do gpa-0.9.9 then? :) (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #7) > > working for me. > > Maybe we can finally do gpa-0.9.9 then? :) Sure! Will love to see old version go away. Stable on alpha. amd64 stable x86 stable sparc stable ppc stable ppc64 stable. Closing. |