Summary: | media-gfx/exiv2-0.24 stable request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Pacho Ramos <pacho> |
Component: | [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization | Assignee: | Gentoo Graphics Project <graphics+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | kde, nikoli |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 495286, 512468 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 530258 |
Description
Pacho Ramos
2014-10-20 11:32:01 UTC
1. Does the exiv2-0.24.ebuild which does support py3.4 inherit the fail from 495286? 0.23-r2 != -0.24. Besides, comment 8: If I don't hear anything by Sept 20, I'll go ahead and mark this invalid. but he never did. Even if it does, a doc build is not essential and in my view doesn't warrant blocking a stable of this version. CC'ing arches and can be undone if 'really' about this, BUT this is needed to unblock python-3.4-stable. Stable for HPPA. RepoMan scours the neighborhood...
>>> Creating Manifest for /home/zlogene/gentoo-x86/media-gfx/exiv2
dependency.bad 18
media-gfx/exiv2/exiv2-0.24.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['>=virtual/libiconv-0-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=dev-libs/expat-2.1.0-r3[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]']
media-gfx/exiv2/exiv2-0.24.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['>=virtual/libiconv-0-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=dev-libs/expat-2.1.0-r3[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]']
media-gfx/exiv2/exiv2-0.24.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['>=virtual/libiconv-0-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=dev-libs/expat-2.1.0-r3[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]']
media-gfx/exiv2/exiv2-0.24.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['>=virtual/libiconv-0-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=dev-libs/expat-2.1.0-r3[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]']
media-gfx/exiv2/exiv2-0.24.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['>=virtual/libiconv-0-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=dev-libs/expat-2.1.0-r3[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]']
media-gfx/exiv2/exiv2-0.24.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['>=virtual/libiconv-0-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=dev-libs/expat-2.1.0-r3[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]']
media-gfx/exiv2/exiv2-0.24.ebuild: DEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome/systemd) ['>=virtual/libiconv-0-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=dev-libs/expat-2.1.0-r3[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]', '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]']
+ 13 Dec 2014; Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> + no-emul-linux-x86/package.use.stable.mask, package.use.stable.mask: + Stable-mask abi_x86_32 for bug #526042. Should be fixed now. amd64 stable arm stable Should the stable keywords reverted? I would instead apply the patch to fix that new CVE and CC arches there (closing this as a duplicate of that one) (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #8) > I would instead apply the patch to fix that new CVE and CC arches there > (closing this as a duplicate of that one) Sounds reasonable. We will procede in bug #534608. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 534608 *** |