Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 454164

Summary: dev-libs/glib needs to own /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Michał Górny <mgorny>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: flameeyes, lu_zero, media-video
Priority: Normal Keywords: InVCS
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: The build log

Description Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2013-01-26 14:02:26 UTC
Created attachment 336902 [details]
The build log

* package media-gfx/entangle-0.5.0 NOT merged
 * 
 * Detected file collision(s):
 * 
 * 	/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled
 * 
 * Searching all installed packages for file collisions...
 * 
 * Press Ctrl-C to Stop
 * 
 * None of the installed packages claim the file(s).
Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-01-26 14:04:25 UTC
Grml I fixed this once already ... @gnome please advise?
Comment 2 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-01-28 16:22:26 UTC
I think we are going to do what was suggested on dev ml.

glib ebuild will be changed to install this file as owned by the glib ebuild so that is is clear for everyone else that this file is actually owned by something in gentoo.

Any cons (besides changing checksum) ?
Comment 3 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-03-01 06:50:54 UTC
@gnome can you fix this for me then? :P
Comment 4 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-03-01 11:50:59 UTC
I guess that given there was no objection we will proceed.
Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-06-11 10:36:07 UTC
(In reply to Gilles Dartiguelongue from comment #2)
> I think we are going to do what was suggested on dev ml.
> 
> glib ebuild will be changed to install this file as owned by the glib ebuild
> so that is is clear for everyone else that this file is actually owned by
> something in gentoo.
> 
> Any cons (besides changing checksum) ?

How should we do that? :) (I where can I see an example of an ebuild owning a package it's not really installing, since this file is regenerated)
Comment 6 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-04-27 22:33:03 UTC
This was done in the 3.10 dev cycle. Closing.