Summary: | sys-fs/udisks-1.0.4-r3 - udev rule 80-udisks.rules fails, the external pci-db program is to be replaced by the internal hwdb. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Konstantin (elxa) <ktrackfd> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Freedesktop bugs <freedesktop-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | ktrackfd, tomwij |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://forums-web2.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7057112.html?sid=de7de2f7c8449656bdd7083465fd9278 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Konstantin (elxa)
2012-12-15 00:40:41 UTC
The needed change is actually: IMPORT{program}="pci-db %p" to IMPORT{builtin}="hwdb" but obviously this is udev version dependent. > CC freedesktop-bugs@gentoo.org
Please do not use the CC feature as an under-the-radar maintainer assignment.
(In reply to comment #2) > > CC freedesktop-bugs@gentoo.org > > Please do not use the CC feature as an under-the-radar maintainer assignment. Actually, I've just put the cursor in the wrong cell and didn't notice it at submission. I see ArchLinux is completely dropping the line, https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/drop-pci-db.patch?h=packages/udisks So that should work for all versions of udev, but do we actually lose something by doing it like this? I'm between doing this and Comment #1 went with ArchLinux patch and raised virtual/udev dependency, now requiring 196 +*udisks-1.0.4-r4 (15 Dec 2012) + + 15 Dec 2012; Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> +udisks-1.0.4-r4.ebuild, + +files/udisks-1.0.4-drop-pci-db.patch: + Remove usage of old pci-db and rely upon >=virtual/udev-196 dependency to + bring us internal hwdb support wrt #447304 by "Konstantin" |