Summary: | Please stabilize net-misc/wicd-1.7.2.4-r2 (was: wicd-curses fails with urwid-1.1) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | John Hutchison <heimdal> |
Component: | [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization | Assignee: | Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) <tomka> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | atlantic777, bugzie, c1pher, tomwij |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7176462.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 450678 |
Description
John Hutchison
2012-11-06 00:34:39 UTC
Where did you get dev-python/urwid-1.1.0-r1000 and which extra patches does it contain? Does it work with in-tree urwid? (In reply to comment #1) > Where did you get dev-python/urwid-1.1.0-r1000 and which extra patches does > it contain? Does it work with in-tree urwid? I use funtoo's git tree. I honestly thought it was just a straight pull off the Gentoo rsync servers. I will fully and readily admit, I am wrong on that one. The ebuild doesn't seem to include any patches (and pulls from excess.org/urwid for the tar ball) This being the case, I also grabbed the Gentoo ebuild, and it pulls from the same source. (I can only assume then it's the same issue for both, deper29 and SlashBeast on the forums both stated it broke their wicds and I assume they use the gentoo rsync tree.) I see, the -r1000 was a red herring. Just the plain release of urwid-1.1.0 breaks wicd. This has happened before, urwid changes the interface on every version. I reported it on the wicd launchpad and you can follow the bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/wicd/+bug/1075399 (In reply to comment #2) > I use funtoo's git tree. I honestly thought it was just a straight pull off > the Gentoo rsync servers. I will fully and readily admit, I am wrong on that > one. The ebuild doesn't seem to include any patches (and pulls from > excess.org/urwid for the tar ball) > > This being the case, I also grabbed the Gentoo ebuild, and it pulls from the > same source. (I can only assume then it's the same issue for both, deper29 > and SlashBeast on the forums both stated it broke their wicds and I assume > they use the gentoo rsync tree.) Funtoo pulls in the progress-overlay for a lot of its python support which is maintained by Arfrever and uses his own 4-python EAPI so the differences between that and Gentoo can often be substantial. (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I use funtoo's git tree. I honestly thought it was just a straight pull off > > the Gentoo rsync servers. I will fully and readily admit, I am wrong on that > > one. The ebuild doesn't seem to include any patches (and pulls from > > excess.org/urwid for the tar ball) > > > > This being the case, I also grabbed the Gentoo ebuild, and it pulls from the > > same source. (I can only assume then it's the same issue for both, deper29 > > and SlashBeast on the forums both stated it broke their wicds and I assume > > they use the gentoo rsync tree.) > > Funtoo pulls in the progress-overlay for a lot of its python support which > is maintained by Arfrever and uses his own 4-python EAPI so the differences > between that and Gentoo can often be substantial. I tried, it also fails with Gentoo's urwid-1.1.0. (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > I use funtoo's git tree. I honestly thought it was just a straight pull off > > > the Gentoo rsync servers. I will fully and readily admit, I am wrong on that > > > one. The ebuild doesn't seem to include any patches (and pulls from > > > excess.org/urwid for the tar ball) > > > > > > This being the case, I also grabbed the Gentoo ebuild, and it pulls from the > > > same source. (I can only assume then it's the same issue for both, deper29 > > > and SlashBeast on the forums both stated it broke their wicds and I assume > > > they use the gentoo rsync tree.) > > > > Funtoo pulls in the progress-overlay for a lot of its python support which > > is maintained by Arfrever and uses his own 4-python EAPI so the differences > > between that and Gentoo can often be substantial. > > I tried, it also fails with Gentoo's urwid-1.1.0. Should be fixed in -r2. Please test. Hijacking this bug for stabilization. Arches, please test and stable. The new version has only one patch more than the old stable and this fixes compatibility with all known versions of urwid. amd64 stable @Thomas: we need wicd stable for ppc/ppc64 for bug 450678, is fine for you?if yes, cc arches and block 450678 (In reply to comment #9) > @Thomas: > > we need wicd stable for ppc/ppc64 for bug 450678, is fine for you?if yes, cc > arches and block 450678 I don't see anything against new stable versions for those arches, but I also don't use them. Please test and mark stable if possible. ppc stable ppc64 stable x86 stable |