Summary: | app-office/libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2-r1 missing font 'Nimbus Sans L' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Nils Stöckmann <accounts> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Office Team <office> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | accounts |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 407649 | ||
Attachments: |
document containing nimbus sans L
comparsion between 3.3 and 3.5 |
Description
Nils Stöckmann
2012-02-28 23:45:50 UTC
I added dependency over urw-fonts which should provide the nimbus fonts. Looks like 3.3 binary did provide the fonts internaly. Could you please sync and install the urw-fonts and see if it is still looking differently? Hi Thomas, I have media-fonts/urw-fonts-2.4.9 installed since 04th of november 2011. I Installed Libreoffice-bin-3.3.4 in this february and Nimbus Sans L worked, and libreoffice-bin-3.4.5 shortly after that and it didn't work - although urw-fonts was present. That looks to me, like It's not about a missing dependency, however some other error. What do you think? Hmm, there was no change in prefferences wrt the config that is set in the libreoffice-core. It might be caused due to change from internal fontconfig to system one, where your system one is wrongly set or point to different subset of fonts? I will try to reproduce it later on once again when I get off from work. Also could you by any chance attach some test document if i won't manage to reproduce it? Created attachment 304897 [details]
document containing nimbus sans L
Created attachment 307791 [details]
comparsion between 3.3 and 3.5
I just managed to do the comparsion, so image should speak more than words.
I still have no clue how to fix it yet sadly.
Hi,
nice to see you get the same behaviour.
What about the clue
> It might be caused due to change from internal fontconfig to system one, where your system one is wrongly set or point to different subset of fonts?
?
Thank you for having a look at this.
After bit research. This stuff was fixed in 3.6 branch as I can't reproduce it anymore. So closing the bug :-) |