Summary: | please stabilize =app-portage/eix-0.22.11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) <darkside> |
Component: | [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization | Assignee: | Martin Väth <martin> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | gentoo, nikoli, ppc64, thomas.jaeger, usefuljunk |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED)
2011-08-17 17:48:23 UTC
works for me amd64 ok amd64 ok amd64 done. Thanks Agostino and Tomas Archtested x86 on 2 systems: Good to go x86 stable, thanks JD ppc stable Stable for HPPA. arm stable alpha/ia64/m68k/s390/sh/sparc stable Why this version was removed today from portage tree? Now latest stable for amd64 is 0.22.5, downgrading from 0.22.11 seems unreasonable. (In reply to comment #10) > Why this version was removed today from portage tree? Now latest stable for > amd64 is 0.22.5, downgrading from 0.22.11 seems unreasonable. + 06 Sep 2011; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> +eix-0.22.11.ebuild: + Reintroduce last stable, it appears to have been accidentally deleted. This + is based on a report by Nikoli in bug #379603 and by J.D. Horelick on IRC. (In reply to comment #10) > Why this version was removed today from portage tree? Now latest stable for > amd64 is 0.22.5, downgrading from 0.22.11 seems unreasonable. My mistake, apologies. General displeasure that ppc64 took so long to get to this. I wonder if *any* ppc64 user would care if I dropped it in the nex stablereq. Only one way to find out, waiting 4+ months is not an option, IMO. + 06 Dec 2011; Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org> eix-0.22.11.ebuild: + mark ppc64, bug 379603 |