Summary: | net-fs/cifs-utils shouldn't fail to build because of kernel options | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo's SAMBA Team <samba> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | qa |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | Build log |
Description
Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
2011-04-24 14:54:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > Created attachment 271013 [details] > Build log > > Unless it is building a kernel module, the code should build just fine with a > non-cifs-enabled kernel. You _don't_ want to *force* runtime requirements at > build time as that disallows cross-compilation and binpkg distribution. > There's no much point in building net-fs/cifs-utils without cifs enabled in the kernel. You won't be able to mount samba shares without that support enabled (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Created attachment 271013 [details] > > Build log > > > > Unless it is building a kernel module, the code should build just fine with a > > non-cifs-enabled kernel. You _don't_ want to *force* runtime requirements at > > build time as that disallows cross-compilation and binpkg distribution. > > > > There's no much point in building net-fs/cifs-utils without cifs enabled in the > kernel. You won't be able to mount samba shares without that support enabled Read what Diego said again, because it looks like you replied without reading it... Replacing eerror to ewarn and dropping die. |