Bug 355649

Summary:	=app-arch/xz-utils-5.0.1: stable request
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	kfm
Component:	[OLD] Core system	Assignee:	Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	enhancement	Keywords:	STABLEREQ
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	342961

Description kfm 2011-02-20 02:13:14 UTC

Perhaps this could be targetted for stabilization on the basis that:

1) there are no open bugs against it
2) the current version marked as stable is an official beta
3) stabilizing >=5.0.0 would allow closure of bug 342961

Comment 1 blain 'Doc' Anderson 2011-03-01 03:22:19 UTC

amd64 compiles fine. appears to function as stated.

Comment 2 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-03-01 09:26:12 UTC

amd64 done. Thanks Blain

Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-03-01 21:04:18 UTC

Stable for HPPA.

Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester

2011-03-01 21:31:32 UTC

It seems weird to mark -r0 stable when -r1 only fixes typos that cause some usability issues. IOW, -r0 is being marked stable with a runtime issue that will hit users.

*xz-utils-5.0.1-r1 (01 Mar 2011)

  01 Mar 2011; Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> +xz-utils-5.0.1-r1.ebuild,
  +files/xz-utils-5.0.1-xzgrep-typo.patch:
  Fix by Martin Väth for typo in xzgrep #356627 by Diego Elio Pettenò.

Can the target be changed here to ensure our users don't hit this [fixed] bug?

Comment 5 Andreas Schürch gentoo-dev

2011-03-04 13:02:35 UTC

I tested =app-arch/xz-utils-5.0.1-r1 on x86. No problems found!

Comment 6 Alex Buell 2011-03-04 22:05:00 UTC

=app-arch/xz-utils-5.0.1-r1 tested on SPARC. unpacking and packing tarballs worked fine. Stabilisation would be good.

Comment 7 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2011-03-05 09:24:10 UTC

it isnt weird at all.  the bug in question isnt a regression to the stable version, so users (if they happen to hit the bug) have already been hitting it.

which version arch people pick is up to them, but you're asking about an ebuild that has been in the tree for less than 24 hrs (based on when you commented).

Comment 8 Michael Weber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-03-05 17:21:33 UTC

ppc/sparc stable

Comment 9 Michael Weber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-03-06 00:54:06 UTC

arm stable

Comment 10 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-03-06 13:20:32 UTC

stable x86, thanks Andreas

Comment 11 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-03-12 14:05:55 UTC

Stable on alpha.

Comment 12 Kacper Kowalik (Xarthisius) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-03-16 15:57:27 UTC

ppc64 stable

Comment 13 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-03-20 18:40:07 UTC

ia64/m68k/s390/sh stable, closing