Bug 343095

Summary:	sys-apps/util-linux - add cramfs use flag
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Kfir Lavi <lavi.kfir>
Component:	[OLD] Core system	Assignee:	Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	enhancement	CC:	bug
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Kfir Lavi 2010-10-28 15:17:32 UTC

Hi,
Is it possible to add a use flag for util-linux that disable cramfs support?
There is a compilation options for it.

Regards,
Kfir

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2010-11-22 01:04:41 UTC

added USE=cramfs

http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-apps/util-linux/util-linux-2.18-r1.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-apps/util-linux/util-linux-9999.ebuild?r1=1.15&r2=1.16

Comment 2 Marcin Mirosław 2010-11-23 10:21:29 UTC

Is it necessary to have ebuild with +cramfs flag? Cramfs isn't popular filesystem, imho, if somebody need tools for one, he can add proper flag to make.conf. For other users it's unneeded overload.

Comment 3 Kfir Lavi 2010-11-23 10:56:33 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
> Is it necessary to have ebuild with +cramfs flag? Cramfs isn't popular
> filesystem, imho, if somebody need tools for one, he can add proper flag to
> make.conf. For other users it's unneeded overload.
> 

Yes you are right. I think cramfs should be optional. 

Regards,
Kfir

Comment 4 Kfir Lavi 2010-11-23 10:57:23 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> added USE=cramfs
> 
> http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-apps/util-linux/util-linux-2.18-r1.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3
> http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-apps/util-linux/util-linux-9999.ebuild?r1=1.15&r2=1.16
> 

Thanks for your fix. 

Kfir

Comment 5 Marcin Mirosław 2010-12-22 16:13:29 UTC

Is any chance to change "+cramfs" to "cramfs"?

Comment 6 Marcin Mirosław 2011-03-02 09:11:14 UTC

Probably it need to much work to do it and to answer :(