Bug 33123 - im-ja version 0.8 now includes XIM (distfile needs new digest)
Bug#: 33123 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: cjk@gentoo.org Reported By: plate@gentoo.org
Component: Applications
URL: 
Summary: im-ja version 0.8 now includes XIM (distfile needs new digest)
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2003-11-10 00:39 0000
Description:   Opened: 2003-11-10 00:39 0000 
Yesterday the developer of im-ja has announced xim support
for non-GTK-applications. This being great in itself, he
unfortunately hasn't changed the version number, meaning 
the old tarball named im-ja-0.8.tar.gz is not the same as 
the one residing at the ebuild's SRC_URI now.

------- Comment #1 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2003-11-10 03:20:19 0000 ------- 
Can you show exactly the SRC_URI where we can get the sourcetarball? I've
just fetched im-ja from http://im-ja.sourceforge.net/im-ja-0.8.tar.gzbut
it has the same MD5 as in /usr/portage/app-i18n/im-ja/files/digest-im-ja-0.8.

------- Comment #2 From Ulrich Plate (RETIRED) 2003-11-10 03:37:41 0000 ------- 
Of course. The new tarball is here:
http://siliconium.net/~boti/im-ja/im-ja-0.8.tar.gz


Check http://www.tlug.jp/ML/0311/msg00056.html for the 
announcement and a few details on what B0Ti did. ID & 
password for the mailing list archive are:
http://www.tlug.jp/images/tlug-pword.png.

------- Comment #3 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2003-11-10 06:27:53 0000 ------- 
yakina, what do you think about making an ebuild with a different
name, say, im-ja-0.9_alpha20031109.ebuild ?

------- Comment #4 From Ulrich Plate (RETIRED) 2003-11-11 01:43:54 0000 ------- 
Coincidentally, this is what the author implicitly seems to 
recommend. :) Quoting http://www.tlug.jp/ML/0311/msg00061.html:

"The official v0.8 release (from September) available from SF 
doesn't have any xim support, I was just too lazy to bump the 
version number for this preview release  to 0.9-alpha. I'd want 
to wait pushing this into portage until it's released as 0.9."

Sorry to have started this unnecessary precipitation...

------- Comment #5 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2003-12-13 07:30:57 0000 ------- 
I've just included it as im-ja-0.9_alpha20031109.ebuild.  It is masked
until the next 0.9 release, so if you are interested in trying it,
unmask it using /etc/portage/package.unmask and then emerge.
Thanks for reporting.