Summary: | hpacucli-8.70.8.0.ebuild | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Daniel Nagy <daniel.nagy> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Wolfram Schlich (RETIRED) <wschlich> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | ramereth |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/SoftwareDescription.jsp?lang=en&cc=us&prodTypeId=0&prodSeriesId=0&swItem=MTX-dbb1474b430943f78dc4c33f36&mode=3 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
hpacucli-8.40.4.0.ebuild
Patch for the previous version of hpacucli |
Description
Daniel Nagy
2010-04-19 14:14:02 UTC
Created attachment 228395 [details]
hpacucli-8.40.4.0.ebuild
Don't attach anything without a comment. If the ebuild doesn't need to be changed - just say it. If you attach something, a unified diff is preferred. You mean I should upload a diff to the previous version of the ebuild? (In reply to comment #3) > You mean I should upload a diff to the previous version of the ebuild? > If it - apart from the version number or similar triviality - does differ, yes. Looking at attached files, downloading and diffing are slow and boring tasks. Probably we should have a script to deal with attachments semi-automatically. In any case: Easy to process bug reports means more productive developers and in the end a better user experience. I perfectly understand and agree with you. I just followed the official ebuild submitting guide, but I'll do it this way next time. Created attachment 228605 [details, diff]
Patch for the previous version of hpacucli
The changes are not to serious. The documentation has been removed from the rpm by HP, so it's downloaded seperately and handled correctly and the downloading URL changed.
Pushed to portage. Thanks for the report! |