Bug 308549

Summary:	GNOME 2.26 stabilization, pass #2
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Nirbheek Chauhan (RETIRED) <nirbheek>
Component:	[OLD] GNOME	Assignee:	Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	pacho, radist.morse
Priority:	High	Keywords:	STABLEREQ
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Attachments:	Stabilization list for 2.26, pass #2 Updated package list

Description Nirbheek Chauhan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-03-08 23:16:06 UTC

Hello arches, attached below is a list of packages that contain bugfixes released during the 2.26 gnome release cycle. The changes in these packages are mostly small, hence compile-test should suffice (except perhaps rhythmbox and nautilus-open-terminal).

These are relatively easy to stabilize, so please don't hesitate to not err on the side of caution :)

Thanks in advance!

Comment 1 Nirbheek Chauhan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-03-08 23:17:48 UTC

Created attachment 222745 [details]
Stabilization list for 2.26, pass #2

Apologies for the \r\n line delimiters, the file was created on windows.

Comment 2 Nirbheek Chauhan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-03-08 23:18:54 UTC

*** Bug 308445 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2010-03-11 15:56:53 UTC

*** Bug 308089 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2010-03-11 21:08:50 UTC

amd64 stable except rhythmbox, that depends on 309061

Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2010-03-11 21:32:45 UTC

coherence maintainer would prefer to wait a bit, then, we should probably skip rhythmbox stabilization or stable an older version like 0.12.6 instead. What do you think?

Comment 6 Nirbheek Chauhan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-03-12 18:32:41 UTC

Created attachment 223307 [details]
Updated package list

(In reply to comment #5)
> coherence maintainer would prefer to wait a bit, then, we should probably skip
> rhythmbox stabilization or stable an older version like 0.12.6 instead. What do
> you think?
> 

Alright, let's go with the older version then; updated list

Comment 7 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2010-03-13 09:48:43 UTC

amd64 stable

Comment 8 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-03-15 19:08:43 UTC

ppc stable

Comment 9 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-03-15 19:32:00 UTC

ppc64 done

Comment 10 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-03-16 19:01:50 UTC

x86 stable

Comment 11 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-04-05 15:15:09 UTC

alpha/arm/ia64/sh/sparc stable

Comment 12 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-05-20 19:32:50 UTC

I'm quite certain this won't be happening either.

Comment 13 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-05-20 22:00:56 UTC

Last arch gone, closing.