Bug 30840 - new balsa version 2.0.15
Bug#: 30840 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P1
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: gnome@gentoo.org Reported By: chris@cidesign.ca
Component: Ebuilds
URL:  http://balsa.gnome.org
Summary: new balsa version 2.0.15
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2003-10-10 10:38 0000
Description:   Opened: 2003-10-10 10:38 0000 
There is a new balsa version, 2.0.15

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge sync
2. emerge -up balsa
Actual Results:  
no update

Expected Results:  
an update :)

copying balsa 2.0.14 ebuild to 2.0.15 works fine for me.

------- Comment #1 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2003-10-14 19:08:00 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 31166 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #2 From Will Reinhart 2003-11-04 17:57:56 0000 ------- 
Has everyone forgotten this bug?  All that needs to be done is for someone
to copy balsa-2.0.14.ebuild to balsa-2.0.15.ebuild and do the digests.

------- Comment #3 From Chris Irwin 2003-11-04 18:32:59 0000 ------- 
Maybe we should pre-emptively file a bug for balsa 2.0.16

------- Comment #4 From Martin Klaffenboeck 2003-11-05 02:46:19 0000 ------- 
For me, balsa didn't compile after some updates...

I copied the balsa ebuild to the new version, but I hat do reinstall esmtp,
so I copied the libesmtp ebuild for the new version 1.0.1 (we have 1.0-r1
in portage) and disabled the patch in this file.

That works for me... ;-)

Martin

------- Comment #5 From foser (RETIRED) 2003-11-10 07:56:42 0000 ------- 
sorry guys, this took way too long.

i updated libesmtp to 1.0.1 and balsa to 2.0.15

please give it a go, see if it works ok.

marked libesmtp 1.0-r1 and balsa-2.0.14 x86 stable

this shouldnt happen, feel free to press us more to update significant applications
faster.

------- Comment #6 From Torsten Stets 2003-11-25 02:44:59 0000 ------- 
Was there any reason to change the format of the ebuild? Now it runs configure
with --enable-gtkhtml, ignoring USE="-gtkhtml".

------- Comment #7 From foser (RETIRED) 2003-11-25 05:32:22 0000 ------- 
it's shorter, but it should do the same... are you sure it doesn't work ?

------- Comment #8 From foser (RETIRED) 2003-11-25 07:35:03 0000 ------- 
i double checked and saw my mistake. While cleaning up i moved the switches to
the wrong config line. Just did an -r1 bump that fixed this, please test.