Bug 30462 - blas-19940131-r1.ebuild (Update)
Bug#: 30462 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
Resolution: TEST-REQUEST Assigned To: sci@gentoo.org Reported By: nospam@dolney.com
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: blas-19940131-r1.ebuild (Update)
Keywords:  EBUILD
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2003-10-05 20:37 0000
Description:   Opened: 2003-10-05 20:37 0000 
This ebuild will build a BLAS shared library from the netlib reference
implementation. Please see comments in bug 30453.

It depends on the blas-config tool submitted as bug 30454.

I don't know why the current app-sci/blas ebuild is versioned as 19980702. There
is no indication of this date on the webpage or in the code. The code suggests
the last modification occurred on 1/31/1994.

I've tested building with and without USE="ifc". Either way, I can link to the resulting libraries with g77 or ifc.

------- Comment #1 From Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:37:41 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=18840) [details]
blas-19940131-r1.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:38:02 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=18841) [details]
Makefile

------- Comment #3 From Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:38:37 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=18842) [details]
f77-reference

Profile for blas-config (see bug 30454)

------- Comment #4 From George Shapovalov 2003-10-28 17:53:35 0000 ------- 
In portage, please test.

Will stay package-masked until all blas related changes are ready.

George

------- Comment #5 From George Shapovalov 2004-02-01 19:22:01 0000 ------- 
As per our discussion on how to name packages I moved blas-19940131 to
blas-reference-19940131. I had to adjust SRC_URI (it used $PN) but that was the
only adjustment. It installs the same way, so no other modifications seem to be
necessary to make it work with blas-config, still I would appreciate a quick
test ;).
I adjusted package.mask correspondingly as well..

George

------- Comment #6 From Derek Dolney 2004-02-04 10:41:30 0000 ------- 
I've tested the new ebuild in portage with and without ifc use. It works both
ways.

George wrote:
> it is nice to be able to run multiple install's after just one compile.

Good point. Am I mistaken in that we should not declare RPATH inside
src_compile() since it is also used in src_install()?