Summary: | gnome-base/gnome-control-center-2.26.0 - gnome-keybinding-properties segfault | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Fabiano Francesconi <fabiano.francesconi> |
Component: | [OLD] GNOME | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | pacho |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | Inclusion |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591392 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
emerge --info
backtrace log 1.patch -r1 ebuild |
Description
Fabiano Francesconi
2009-11-02 00:35:49 UTC
Created attachment 209007 [details]
emerge --info
A backtrace of the problem would help http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/backtraces.xml Created attachment 209008 [details]
backtrace log
I think you are suffering: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591392 Created attachment 210278 [details, diff]
1.patch
And attached patch fixes the issue (at least for me) =)
Created attachment 210306 [details]
-r1 ebuild
Renamed above patch to gnome-control-center-2.26.0-keybinding-properties-segfault.patch for being applied by ebuild. Thank you @ Pacho Ramos. Patch solves the issue for me too. Added fixed ebuild that applies the patch. Ops, I think should be closed when patch is applied in cvs. My bad :P (In reply to comment #8) > Ops, I think should be closed when patch is applied in cvs. > > My bad :P > Exactly ;-) Thanks for testing it ugh, yeah the original code was obviously prone to problems. Do you let me commit the fix for this on a new gnome-base/gnome-control-center-2.26.0-r1 release? (In reply to comment #11) > Do you let me commit the fix for this on a new > gnome-base/gnome-control-center-2.26.0-r1 release? > Feel free to do it and don't forget keywords :) Fixed in just commited gnome-control-center-2.26.0-r1 This got me too, on a fully stable install. The patch works, and it clearly fixes a simple bug in the original code. Can we stablise -r1? (In reply to comment #14) > This got me too, on a fully stable install. > The patch works, and it clearly fixes a simple bug in the original code. > > Can we stablise -r1? > This is being handled in bug 308549 |