Summary: | dev-libs/libgee ebuild request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Maksim 'max_posedon' Melnikau <maxposedon> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | jc.bl.dws |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | Inclusion, InOverlay, InVCS |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Maksim 'max_posedon' Melnikau
2009-05-14 05:20:20 UTC
when did it get released ? http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libgee/ http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/libgee/0.1/libgee-0.1.5.tar.bz2 21-Feb-2009 sorry, doesn't understand what info I should provide; libgee-0.1.5 works fine for some OSS projects, why it shouldn't go to portage? so that's not a bump request since 0.1.5 is already in overlay, you just want it in tree right ? (In reply to comment #3) > so that's not a bump request since 0.1.5 is already in overlay, you just want > it in tree right ? right Inclusion keyword even :) just one thing more, ~arm should be added to keywords (at least I need it for arm, for Neo Freerunner, n8xN guys maybe want ~arm too) if you mean you tested it (FEATURES="stricter test" emerge -1 libgee) on arm, then sure, no problem. (In reply to comment #7) > if you mean you tested it (FEATURES="stricter test" emerge -1 libgee) on arm, > then sure, no problem. > I tested it natively on my Neo Freerunner (armv4t) exactly this way. All tests passed and it compiled fine. (In reply to comment #7) > if you mean you tested it (FEATURES="stricter test" emerge -1 libgee) on arm, > then sure, no problem. > I can't do tests, because I'm cross compiling (btw it cross compiles successfully), but I hope Jakub Novak's tests enough commited to the tree. Thanks for reporting. |