Bug 25003 - freedroidrpg-0.9.6.ebuild (New Version)
|
Bug#:
25003
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: normal
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: games@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: pythonhead@gentoo.org
|
|
Component: Ebuilds
|
|
|
URL:
http://freedroid.sourceforge.net/
|
|
Summary: freedroidrpg-0.9.6.ebuild (New Version)
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2003-07-21 15:17 0000
|
New version available, 0.9.6.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Created an attachment (id=14838) [details]
freedroidrpg-0.9.6.ebuild
This is just a slightly modified version of 0.9.4. I took out the
source_unpack() function because 'make distclean' didn't work on 0.9.6.
0.9.6 is running great.
by 0.9.4 i assume you mean 0.9.5_p1 ...
0.9.4 was never in the portage tree ;)
>by 0.9.4 i assume you mean 0.9.5_p1 ...
Yeah, thats what I meant. When a user submits an ebuild like this, do you guys prefer patches rather than ebuilds?
Should I have selected 'games' as the 'Component'? Or just leave it as 'ebuild'?
The reason I ask is because the "Contributing Ebuilds" guide says "All ebuild scripts are of the component type Ebuilds", but I notice some of mine get changed to 'Games'.
I don't know about the rest of the games@g.o crew, but I prefer whole
ebuilds so I can just d/l them straight to my CVS tree and whack away at
them without having to patch a previous ebuild.
all games are under games, otherwise ebuilds go under ebuilds ;)
I prefer a full ebuild, also. It does make it much easier to test without
depending it on an older ebuild.
