Bug 245774 - media-video/vlc < 0.9.6: Buffer overflows in VLC RealText and CUE demuxers (CVE-2008-{5032,5036})
|
Bug#:
245774
(CVE-2008-5032)
|
Product: Gentoo Security
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: normal
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: security@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: aballier@gentoo.org
|
|
Component: Vulnerabilities
|
|
|
URL:
http://www.videolan.org/security/sa0810.html
|
|
Summary: media-video/vlc < 0.9.6: Buffer overflows in VLC RealText and CUE demuxers (CVE-2008-{5032,5036})
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard: B2 [glsa]
|
|
Opened: 2008-11-06 00:15 0000
|
Arches, please test and mark stable
=media-video/vlc-0.9.6
Target keywords:
amd64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86
This probably depends on bug 245793 being fixed (unable to reproduce here due
to lack of a stable system).
alpha: You need to rekeyword AND stable.
ppc64: Apparently you never had VLC stable, so feel free to un-cc yourself.
Sparc stable, works for me, but of course an exhaustive test of this package is
almost impossible. Note, for sparc, this carries along a requirement to mark
stable several other packages:
===============
media-video/dirac-1.0.0
media-libs/libkate-0.2.5
media-libs/zvbi-0.2.33
media-libs/schroedinger-1.0.5
media-libs/libass-0.9.5
===========================
Of these, libkate, zvbi, and libass need to be marked stable on everything.
There's a regression. Video is detached from the interface, which was fixed in
media-video/vlc-0.9.4-r1 with the patch 'embeddedvideo.patch', but it was
removed later.
The patch can be applied cleanly to 0.9.6 and works.
(In reply to comment #5)
> There's a regression. Video is detached from the interface, which was fixed in
> media-video/vlc-0.9.4-r1 with the patch 'embeddedvideo.patch', but it was
> removed later.
The regression was to patch it in order to make it available again...
See bug #240714, my last comment there and the link I posted.
amd64/x86 need the following packages stable, is this ok and which versions
should we pick?
Package Version Current Keywords Masks
============================= =================== ================= =========
media-libs/zvbi 0.2.31 ~x86 K
media-libs/zvbi 0.2.32 ~x86 K
media-libs/zvbi 0.2.33 ~x86 K
media-libs/libv4l 0.5.1 ~x86 K
media-libs/libv4l 0.5.3 ~x86 K
media-libs/libass 0.9.5 ~x86 K
media-libs/libkate 0.2.5 ~x86 K
media-video/vlc 0.9.6 ~x86 K
(In reply to comment #7)
> amd64/x86 need the following packages stable, is this ok and which versions
> should we pick?
> media-libs/zvbi 0.2.33 ~x86 K
this one should be ok
> media-libs/libv4l 0.5.3 ~x86 K
and this one
> media-libs/libass 0.9.5 ~x86 K
ditto
> media-libs/libkate 0.2.5 ~x86 K
ditto
Stable on alpha. (also stabled the four deps mentioned by maekke as well as
fluidsynth (and two of its deps, lash and ladspa-cmt).
I'll keep vlc ~ppc64 for now.
GLSA 200812-24, thanks everyone, sorry about the delay.