Summary: | dev-tex/tex4ht-20080829_p0203 fails to emerge with USE=java | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Erik Zeek <zeekec> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | TeX project <tex> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | john |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
emerge --info
Patch to change XtpipesPrintWriter to PrintWriter Updated ebuild to include above patch |
Description
Erik Zeek
2008-09-01 17:34:02 UTC
Created attachment 164273 [details]
emerge --info
It looks like they've removed their custom PrintWriter but not changed some of the references in the code to use the standard PrintWriter. I've patched my copy and it compiles fine. I'll attach the patch and updated ebuild. Created attachment 164278 [details, diff]
Patch to change XtpipesPrintWriter to PrintWriter
Created attachment 164279 [details]
Updated ebuild to include above patch
(In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=164278) [edit] > Patch to change XtpipesPrintWriter to PrintWriter Indeed, thanks for the patch, this fixes the problem here. Could you please send it to the tex4ht author (his mail should be at the bottom of the homepage), so that we are sure that the removal of XtpipesPrintWriter was not a mistake. Meanwhile I think I should mask that version instead. I've emailed the author and have a reply. He's put up a new version which includes the XtpipesPrintWriter class file, although I wont't have time to check if it compiles until tonight. (In reply to comment #6) > I've emailed the author and have a reply. He's put up a new version which > includes the XtpipesPrintWriter class file, although I wont't have time to > check if it compiles until tonight. > thanks; but at least the version i downloaded ( http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/fix/tex4ht-1.0.2008_09_01_2155.tar.gz ) seems to be exactly the same as the one from 08/29 :( tex4ht-20080902_p1753 should be fine now; thanks for taking care of it! |