Summary: | Stabilize many rox-base and rox-extra packages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jim Ramsay (lack) (RETIRED) <lack> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Rox Herd (OBSOLETE) <rox+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2007.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Jim Ramsay (lack) (RETIRED)
2008-08-28 19:33:40 UTC
I am sorry if this is the wrong place to request less restrictive keywording, but I have the following Rox packages working fine on ~amd64 ~ppc ~x86 : rox-base/mime-editor-0.5-r2 rox-base/oroborox-0.9.8-r1 rox-base/pager-1.1-r2 rox-base/rox-2.8 rox-base/rox-clib-2.1.10 rox-base/rox-lib-2.0.5 rox-base/rox-session-0.30-r4 rox-base/tasklist-0.5 rox-base/thumbs-0.1.4 rox-base/volume-009-r1 rox-base/xdg-menu-1.4 rox-base/zeroinstall-injector-0.33 rox-extra/clock-2.1.7 rox-extra/edit-2.0-r1 rox-extra/fetch-0.3.3 rox-extra/mp3ogg2wav-1.0 rox-extra/roxcd-0.5.4-r2 rox-extra/roxdao-0.4-r1 rox-extra/roxiso-061007-r1 rox-extra/wallpaper-2.1 rox-extra/weather-0.3.1 x11-terms/roxterm-1.11.1 (In reply to comment #1) > I am sorry if this is the wrong place to request less restrictive keywording, > but I have the following Rox packages working fine on ~amd64 ~ppc ~x86 : This is exactly the place - In fact, I just moved most of those packages from ~amd64 to amd64 myself, and I'm expecting that the x86 and ppc arch teams should be moving everything in my lists above from ~x86 to ~ppc, except of course the things that are not yet ~ppc. So, are you saying that you actually have that whole list working such that ~ppc should be added to all those packages? If so, then would the ppc team CC'd here already please consider adding their keywords to the list of packages in Comment #1? However, I will *not* stabilize oroborox, since it's not really feature-complete as a WM right now. Also, I do not maintain <x11-terms/roxterm> so I suggest you open a separate bug about that one package. Thanks! Ok, so I keyworded the original list to be ppc. Then I found the ones listed in the next comment for ppc and marked those without a keyword as ~. please note the following minor issues that I spotted: rox-base/pager-1.1-r2: * QA Warning: running autoconf in compile phase rox-base/systemtrayn-0.3.2: * QA Warning: running autoconf in compile phase rox-base/tasklist-0.5: * QA Warning: running autoconf in compile phase rox-base/rox-clib-2.1.10: dodoc: /usr/lib/ROX-CLib does not exist x86 stable anyway. alpha/sparc stable actually remove x86, everybody is done. |